Thanks Kevin, Phil.
I find it encouraging that there is a plan to include jfx as part of the
jdk forest as that will lead to a smoother build process.
Hopefully there will still be a mechanism to add OpenJFX to other JDKs
(Zulu etc.) in a post-Jigsaw world.
I filed a bug just as a reminder:
On 08/18/2015 03:23 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
Currently the gradle openZip method makes it easy to create builds that
unpack into OpenJDK / Zulu JDK but this assumes a pre-Jigsaw (JRE)
structure
and doesn't work with JDK9. Shall I submit a bug?
We are in the process of making major
Hi,
Please could someone briefly explain the changes to OpenJFX under JDK9 /
modularisation / jigsaw?
I've been trying to answer some questions about this in the London Java
Community (JUG) and have added 8u40 stable binaries to my OpenJFX build
server as that was requested:
...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of
Chris Newland
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 10:07 PM
To: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: OpenJFX / JDK 9 questions
Hi,
Please could someone briefly explain the changes to OpenJFX under JDK9 /
modularisation / jigsaw?
I've been trying to answer some questions about
