On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 12:53:13 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> Michael Strauß has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> changes as per review comments
>
>
On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 20:26:24 GMT, Michael Strauß wrote:
>> The documentation for `ObservableListBase.nextRemove` states that a single
>> change always refers to the current state of the list, which likely means
>> that multiple disjoint removed ranges need to be applied in order, otherwise
>>
On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 20:26:24 GMT, Michael Strauß wrote:
>> The documentation for `ObservableListBase.nextRemove` states that a single
>> change always refers to the current state of the list, which likely means
>> that multiple disjoint removed ranges need to be applied in order, otherwise
>>
On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 20:26:24 GMT, Michael Strauß wrote:
>> The documentation for `ObservableListBase.nextRemove` states that a single
>> change always refers to the current state of the list, which likely means
>> that multiple disjoint removed ranges need to be applied in order, otherwise
>>
> The documentation for `ObservableListBase.nextRemove` states that a single
> change always refers to the current state of the list, which likely means
> that multiple disjoint removed ranges need to be applied in order, otherwise
> the next change's `getFrom` doesn't refer to the correct
