On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 08:19:28 GMT, Hima Bindu Meda wrote:
>> We currently use libxml2 version 2.9.12. It should be updated to latest
>> stable release, which is version 2.9.13.
>> The steps to update libxml are documented in UPDATING.txt.
>> There is compilation issue with the release 2.9.13, as
On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 08:19:28 GMT, Hima Bindu Meda wrote:
>> We currently use libxml2 version 2.9.12. It should be updated to latest
>> stable release, which is version 2.9.13.
>> The steps to update libxml are documented in UPDATING.txt.
>> There is compilation issue with the release 2.9.13, as
On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 08:19:28 GMT, Hima Bindu Meda wrote:
>> We currently use libxml2 version 2.9.12. It should be updated to latest
>> stable release, which is version 2.9.13.
>> The steps to update libxml are documented in UPDATING.txt.
>> There is compilation issue with the release 2.9.13, as
On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 08:19:28 GMT, Hima Bindu Meda wrote:
>> We currently use libxml2 version 2.9.12. It should be updated to latest
>> stable release, which is version 2.9.13.
>> The steps to update libxml are documented in UPDATING.txt.
>> There is compilation issue with the release 2.9.13, as
On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 08:22:22 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> This looks good. Just for my understanding: this is the 2.9.13-tagged plus
> the fix for the issue with xmlValidNormalizeString() with
> --without-valid-build
>
On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 08:19:28 GMT, Hima Bindu Meda wrote:
>> We currently use libxml2 version 2.9.12. It should be updated to latest
>> stable release, which is version 2.9.13.
>> The steps to update libxml are documented in UPDATING.txt.
>> There is compilation issue with the release 2.9.13, as
> We currently use libxml2 version 2.9.12. It should be updated to latest
> stable release, which is version 2.9.13.
> The steps to update libxml are documented in UPDATING.txt.
> There is compilation issue with the release 2.9.13, as mentioned here:
>
