Re: Request for backport of JDK-8144501

2016-05-09 Thread Jonathan Giles
Unfortunately openjfx-dev stripped the attachment, so please send that 
directly to me.


Are you certain that the linked changeset is the only change necessary 
to resolve the issue? A lot of code has changed in the selection models, 
and whilst the linked changeset is small enough that it can be 
backported, I'd be worried that it wasn't sufficient. If you haven't 
made a build with this change I can do it at some point, but please do 
flick through your test app.


Thanks,

-- Jonathan

On 10/05/16 6:25 AM, Robert Lichtenberger wrote:
We are currently experience null pointer problems that have their root 
cause in https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8144501.


The attached example demonstrates the problem: Click the first row, 
then Ctrl-Click the second row, then Ctrl-Click (i.e. deselect) the 
first row.


Up to jdk1.8.0_51 the output was (correct):
1Doe
1
---

but from jdk1.8.0_60 on the output is:
null
1
---

jdk-9-ea+116_linux-x64_bin.tar.gz shows correct output again.

Is there a way to backport the fixes (from 
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/9-dev/rt/rev/9b7e677b5314)?


Best regards,
Robert






Request for backport of JDK-8144501

2016-05-09 Thread Robert Lichtenberger
We are currently experience null pointer problems that have their root 
cause in https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8144501.


The attached example demonstrates the problem: Click the first row, then 
Ctrl-Click the second row, then Ctrl-Click (i.e. deselect) the first row.


Up to jdk1.8.0_51 the output was (correct):
1Doe
1
---

but from jdk1.8.0_60 on the output is:
null
1
---

jdk-9-ea+116_linux-x64_bin.tar.gz shows correct output again.

Is there a way to backport the fixes (from 
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/9-dev/rt/rev/9b7e677b5314)?


Best regards,
Robert