Hi Kevin, I had already expected something like this (while I did not know the process in detail). It's definitely not an urgent thing, postponing it will not block other work. I already investigated it now, because applying it would probably make things easier when fixing other issues related to FXCanvas.
Best Regards, Alexander > Am 22.09.2016 um 14:21 schrieb Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>: > > Hi Alexander, > > Since this is an enhancement, it needs to go through the FC extension process > indicated here: > > http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk9/fc-extension-process > > First and foremost, we will need to assess the impact of the change and > whether this is the right time to consider such a change. I note that since > this does not add additional functionality, but just refactors existing > functionality to be easier to maintain, we might at least consider it when/if > the recently announced schedule slip for JDK 9 becomes effective. > > -- Kevin > > > Alexander Nyssen wrote: >> Hallo Kevin, Alexander Z, Vadim, >> >> I have created an initial patch for the replacement of AbstractEvents with >> direct usage of JavaFX representations: >> >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166242 >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~anyssen/8166242/webrev.00/ >> >> Best Regards, >> Alexander
