Select-binding still warns about null steps

[Werner Lehmann]

Hi,

it seems as if bindings created with Bindings.selectXXX still do not 
support null steps fully. With RT-35957 the log level of NPEs caused by 
null steps was reduced to FINE. Howver, in 8u25 there is a still a 
warning logged for a perfectly normal operation:

Dez 15, 2014 12:59:44 PM 
com.sun.javafx.binding.SelectBinding$SelectBindingHelper getObservableValue
WARNING: Exception while evaluating select-binding [window]

Example code:

  @Override
  public void start(Stage primaryStage) throws Exception
  {
    ObjectBinding<Object> binding = Bindings.select(primaryStage.sceneProperty(), 
"window");
    binding.get();
  }

Explanation for this seems obvious, on level WARNING there is at least 
one line logged always, unaffected by the change to FINE:

                    final PlatformLogger logger = Logging.getLogger();
                    if (logger.isLoggable(Level.WARNING)) {
                        Logging.getLogger().warning("Exception while evaluating 
select-binding " + stepsToString());
                        if (ex instanceof  IllegalStateException) {
                            logger.warning("Property '" + propertyNames[i] + "' does 
not exist in " + obj.getClass(), ex);
                        } else if (ex instanceof NullPointerException) {
                            logger.fine("Property '" + propertyNames[i] + "' in " + 
properties[i] + " is null", ex);
                        } else {
                            Logging.getLogger().warning("", ex);
                        }
                    }

As a result I am getting exception warnings logged leading to questions 
leading to explanations and bug tickets etc. I tried to work around it 
by reducing the log level:

- created file "logging.properties" in classpath root with content 
"beans.level = OFF"
- added VM argument "-Djava.util.logging.config.file=logging.properties"

While this works standalone it does not seem to be accepted in a 
Webstart JNLP file because it is not a whitelisted secure property.

Any ideas about that?

Thx,
Werner