Re: issues on javafxports/openjdk-jfx

2021-03-30 Thread Kevin Rushforth
Would archiving the repository work for this? [1] -- Kevin [1] https://docs.github.com/en/github/creating-cloning-and-archiving-repositories/archiving-a-github-repository On 3/30/2021 11:16 AM, John Neffenger wrote: On 3/28/21 5:24 AM, Johan Vos wrote: I'm still in favor of closing it thoug

Re: issues on javafxports/openjdk-jfx

2021-03-30 Thread John Neffenger
On 3/28/21 5:24 AM, Johan Vos wrote: I'm still in favor of closing it though. It would be nice if there were a way in GitHub to close the repository to new issues but keep the old ones public and editable. For example, I'm still getting good information on the old closed issues, even as rece

Re: issues on javafxports/openjdk-jfx

2021-03-29 Thread Nir Lisker
Can you make it private? This way we could still see if there are relevant issues there like those that halted during the transition. On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 3:24 PM Johan Vos wrote: > I'm creating a separate thread for this, as it might get lost in other > threads. > We see that issues are stil

issues on javafxports/openjdk-jfx

2021-03-28 Thread Johan Vos
I'm creating a separate thread for this, as it might get lost in other threads. We see that issues are still created in the old github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx project. The README of that project clearly mentions that repository is obsolete, but the issue tracker is still open. It is not hard to