+1 to doing something like this. I just recently discovered FXCollections.concat(ObservableList…) doesn’t do what you propose. I figured that was the whole point.ScottOn Dec 31, 2022, at 3:44 PM, Nir Lisker wrote:We can do better than that. Instead of introducing methods for specific operations,
We can do better than that. Instead of introducing methods for specific
operations, like concat and retain, we can offer bulk operations on
collections. When John H. proposed the fluent bindings additions, we
discussed doing the same for collections after that.
At the very least, we can have a
FXCollections.concat(ObservableList...) can be used to create a new
ObservableList that contains the concatenation of all elements of the
source lists. This is useful to initialize the contents of the new
ObservableList, but the returned list is not kept in sync with the
source lists.
I'm
