These are all good points. One thing we can do is make sure that there
are open JBS Enhancement issues tracking the features that are being
asked for. Prioritizing them, and eventually implementing some of them,
will be a discussion for a different day. As Johan said, we don't want
to over-comm
I've read the responses to this post, and I think they all make sense, so
this is great feedback. It's good to know what people are
missing/interested in.
However, it makes me a bit nervous to see a growing wishlist while I don't
see more funding. Unfortunately, the reality is that most companies
In the spirit of Christmas and of this thread here is my wish list 😊
1 - The number one thing I’d change would be to make JavaFX “more
extendable”. By this I mean having more hooks to extend core areas of
JavaFX (CSS parser, 3D, etc).
The reason I ask for this is because it’s much easier for an
On 2023-11-15, Dirk Lemmermann wrote:
>
> All I want for Christmas is … / what I think is needed for JavaFX
> going forward ...
I wish JavaFX better MARKETING. If I sometimes encounter articles comparing
various frameworks for building desktop apps, JavaFX is never listed.
I was sad about it,
> On Nov 15, 2023, at 9:32 AM, Nir Lisker wrote:
>
>
>> removal of AWT
>
> Isn't that *a lot* of work? All the image IO is AWT, no?
It was a mistake to tie ImageIO to GUI framework image classes. The image
raster should be returned in a generic wrapper around a byte array or
ByteBuffer fro
There are some interesting things on this list, and in some of the
follow-on messages. This reply is just looking at the AWT issue.
It depends on what you mean by "remove AWT". Removing all internal
dependencies (aside from Swing/JavaFX interop of course) on java.desktop
(AWT/Swing/Java2D) and
It is mainly an issue when trying to run a JavaFX app natively (GraalVM,
Gluon). You can not have AWT in your classpath when compiling to native code.
It is not supported.
Dirk
> Am 15.11.2023 um 20:31 schrieb David Alayachew :
>
> My bigger question is asking what you lose by having AWT in J
Subject: Re: My JavaFX Christmas Wishlist
My bigger question is asking what you lose by having AWT in JavaFX. Is there
something fundamentally problematic about it that its removal would
solve/alleviate a problem?
Whereas on the other hand, AWT has some very useful libraries that are in use
by nearly
I agree with Wayland. It is inevitable, and I want JavaFX to perform well
on Linux.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 2:16 PM Thiago Milczarek Sayão <
thiago.sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would choose:
>
> - Wayland
> - Vulkan rendering
> - Copyable labels
> - A pay raise for Kevin :)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
- more reviewers to tackle the perpetual review bottleneck
My bigger question is asking what you lose by having AWT in JavaFX. Is
there something fundamentally problematic about it that its removal would
solve/alleviate a problem?
Whereas on the other hand, AWT has some very useful libraries that are in
use by nearly all Java GUI frameworks. For example,
On Wed, 2023-11-15 at 15:37 -0300, Thiago Milczarek Sayão wrote:
> - Vulkan rendering
Seconded!
> - A pay raise for Kevin :)
Seconded!
--
Mark Raynsford | https://www.io7m.com
+1 for pay raise for Kevin
:-)
-andy
From: openjfx-dev on behalf of Thiago Milczarek
Sayão
Date: Wednesday, November 15, 2023 at 10:38
To: Dirk Lemmermann
Cc: openjfx-dev
Subject: Re: My JavaFX Christmas Wishlist
Hi,
I would choose:
- Wayland
- Vulkan rendering
- Copyable labels
- A pay
Hi,
I would choose:
- Wayland
- Vulkan rendering
- Copyable labels
- A pay raise for Kevin :)
Em qua., 15 de nov. de 2023 07:25, Dirk Lemmermann
escreveu:
> Hi guys,
>
> I already mentioned this at the JavaFX BOF at DEVOXX and also posted this
> on Twitter but wanna make sure it gets th
3D: unfortunately that is completely out of my comfort zone … for this feature
request I am merely the messenger.
AWT: I was thinking that this is mostly a refactoring and probably code
duplication?
Dirk
> Am 15.11.2023 um 14:28 schrieb Nir Lisker :
>
>> 3D line and point primitives
>
> I fil
>
> 3D line and point primitives
>
I filed https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8316398 for this already. As
noted, it requires a somewhat complex computation for intersections and
possibly for contains. If you would like to write these Mesh classes, like
the current TriangleMesh, I can write the r
On Wed, 2023-11-15 at 09:47 +0100, Dirk Lemmermann wrote:
>
> All I want for Christmas is … / what I think is needed for JavaFX
> going forward ...
Is it sad that all I really want for Christmas is to be able to specify
that text under a certain size threshold shouldn't be antialiased? My
JavaFX
Hi guys,
I already mentioned this at the JavaFX BOF at DEVOXX and also posted this on
Twitter but wanna make sure it gets the visibility it deserves:
All I want for Christmas is … / what I think is needed for JavaFX going forward
...
- removal of AWT
- a tray API (tray icon)
18 matches
Mail list logo
