Re: [announce] InhiBeans: mitigate redundant recalculations

2013-12-16 Thread Tomas Mikula
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Tom Eugelink t...@tbee.org wrote: I understand what you are trying to do. I was wondering if a more coarse grained approach would be preferable, so a central registration of whether or not to postpone change events. So: Central.postponeAllChangeEvents()

Re: [announce] InhiBeans: mitigate redundant recalculations

2013-12-16 Thread Tomas Mikula
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Tomas Mikula tomas.mik...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Tom Eugelink t...@tbee.org wrote: I understand what you are trying to do. I was wondering if a more coarse grained approach would be preferable, so a central registration of whether

Re: Javafxpackager build error on Win7 64

2013-12-16 Thread Vadim Pakhnushev
Artem, That was exactly the case, as we discussed off-list. I've asked Francisco to follow up on the list about that and file a JIRA. The problem seems to be that the build system doesn't pick up WinSDK 7.1 installed with the VS2010 Express. Thanks, Vadim On 16.12.2013 13:06, Artem Ananiev

Re: Option to keep Stages always on top on JavaFX 8 ?

2013-12-16 Thread Anthony Petrov
Hi Peter, You might want to watch this bug: https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-153 -- best regards, Anthony On 12/16/2013 12:22 PM, Peter Penzov wrote: Hi All, I'm also interested in this. Can you share some information? Regards, Peter On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Herve

Progress Bar into Combo Box is not working properly

2013-12-16 Thread Peter Penzov
Hi All, I want to implement Progress Bar into Combo Box. I pasted the code here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20518329/combobox-with-progress-bars-is-not-working-properly When I run the code the progress bar is empty. There is no selected Progress Bar which is displayed by default. And

Re: Option to keep Stages always on top on JavaFX 8 ?

2013-12-16 Thread Stephen F Northover
Look how low the bug number is ... we must fix this. Steve On 2013-12-16 8:54 AM, Anthony Petrov wrote: Hi Peter, You might want to watch this bug: https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-153 -- best regards, Anthony On 12/16/2013 12:22 PM, Peter Penzov wrote: Hi All, I'm also

Re: [announce] InhiBeans: mitigate redundant recalculations

2013-12-16 Thread Tomas Mikula
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Tomas Mikula tomas.mik...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Scott Palmer swpal...@gmail.com wrote: Interesting, no worse than John's pattern though. I thought of using a try/finally to make sure release was called and that naturally lead to

Re: discussion about touch events

2013-12-16 Thread Assaf Yavnai
Pavel, See RT-34945 https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-34945 for a good example to the case that touch and mouse event should behave differently on controls. Assaf On 12/15/2013 05:43 PM, Assaf Yavnai wrote: Pavel, I will summarize my answers here, and not inline, I hope I will touch

Re: [announce] InhiBeans: mitigate redundant recalculations

2013-12-16 Thread Richard Bair
Have you looked at https://github.com/Netflix/RxJava by chance? I've been dying to see somebody do an RxJava in JavaFX ever since devoxx and it looks like you may have inadvertently started down that path :-). Richard On Dec 16, 2013, at 8:09 AM, Tomas Mikula tomas.mik...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [announce] InhiBeans: mitigate redundant recalculations

2013-12-16 Thread Tomas Mikula
As a matter of fact, I have. Only to the extent of the Principles of Reactive Programming [1] course that is currently in progress on Coursera. From what I have seen so far, it's all about asynchronous composition (with emphasis on both asynchronous and composition). I didn't see it addressing

RE: [announce] InhiBeans: mitigate redundant recalculations

2013-12-16 Thread John Smith
Perhaps reactive programming is different from the problem Tomas is solving, but I think a research project which combined some of the principles of functional reactive programming (http://lampwww.epfl.ch/~imaier/pub/DeprecatingObserversTR2010.pdf) with JavaFX properties using Java 8 lambdas

Re: [announce] InhiBeans: mitigate redundant recalculations

2013-12-16 Thread Richard Bair
I agree, that's more of what I was thinking. On Dec 16, 2013, at 10:31 AM, John Smith john_sm...@symantec.com wrote: Perhaps reactive programming is different from the problem Tomas is solving, but I think a research project which combined some of the principles of functional reactive

Re: accessibility

2013-12-16 Thread Stephen F Northover
Hi Michael, Accessibility has been on and off the radar for OpenJFX for quite a while now. Some preliminary work was done, but a final implementation and API was never reached. Further, the people who were working on it either left the company or left to work some place else. The thing

Re: [ListView] `b.bind(a)` not behaviorally equivalent to `a.addListener(o - b.set(a.get()))`

2013-12-16 Thread Tomas Mikula
Never mind, b.bind(a); should not be equivalent to a.addListener(o - b.set(a.get())); in the first place, but rather to a.addListener(o - b.set(a.get())); b.set(a.get()); // don't forget this! When I fixed my example, I'm not observing any difference in behavior. I'm still

Re: (In)Sanity Testing Mondays

2013-12-16 Thread Stephen F Northover
Hi all, So we tested and found problems. Let's talk about our findings tomorrow and summarize the results to the list. It's likely faster than back and forth email or posts. I didn't see anyone (in)sane enough in the community taking part. If you tested, you get an opinion on the process.

hg: openjfx/8u-dev/rt: Ensemble8: Fix for RT-34953 [Ensemble] Brick Breaker game is unplayable using the keyboard

2013-12-16 Thread hang . vo
Changeset: 19ee893eda91 Author:Alexander Kouznetsov Date: 2013-12-16 16:33 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8u-dev/rt/rev/19ee893eda91 Ensemble8: Fix for RT-34953 [Ensemble] Brick Breaker game is unplayable using the keyboard !

hg: openjfx/8u-dev/rt: Ensemble8: Fix for RT-31716 java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException in Modena

2013-12-16 Thread hang . vo
Changeset: f339e7628486 Author:Alexander Kouznetsov Date: 2013-12-16 16:54 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8u-dev/rt/rev/f339e7628486 Ensemble8: Fix for RT-31716 java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException in Modena ! apps/experiments/Modena/src/main/java/modena/Modena.java

Re: [announce] InhiBeans: mitigate redundant recalculations

2013-12-16 Thread Tomas Mikula
I had a quick look at Java 8 streams and I'm afraid they are of no use for reactive programming. The fundamental problem is that in java.util.stream, computation is driven by the stream consumer, rather than the stream source, which is a complete opposite of reactive. On the other hand, JavaFX