I wonder what the performance of alternatives to RoboVM is like...
> On 19 Apr 2016, at 03:09, Steve Hannah wrote:
> The Gluon blog post from a few months ago (when @robovm was acquired by
>> @xamarin) is still
The Gluon blog post from a few months ago (when @robovm was acquired by
> @xamarin) is still almost entirely relevant
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Felix Bembrick
I just read this article which states that RoboVM is effectively "shutting
Given that they seem to be a critical part of the puzzle that is making JavaFX
viable on mobile platforms, what does this actually mean for that goal?
Is there an
So what do they use instead?
> On 19 Apr 2016, at 02:52, Steve Hannah wrote:
> According to Gluon, they're not impacted by this.
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Felix Bembrick
Indeed, this doesn't have any impact on JavaFX.
The Gluon tools are currently using the RoboVM AOT 1.8, which was the last
RoboVM delivered a whole set of products, including an AOT, but also a
system that provides some JNI functionality, a set of bindings that create
David and Kevin,
Please review this comment change to Ensemble8. I could not find any of
the PlaygroundProperties for radio buttons in NodePropertiesApp in 8u or
BUG - https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8087648
So what AOT will you be using now? The last RoboVM AOT or something else?
> On 19 Apr 2016, at 03:15, Johan Vos wrote:
> Indeed, this doesn't have any impact on JavaFX.
> The Gluon tools are currently using the RoboVM AOT 1.8, which was the last
> open-source version.
According to Gluon, they're not impacted by this.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Felix Bembrick
> I just read this article which states that RoboVM is effectively "shutting
I'm currently looking if I can get some robovm fork kickstarted. (
It's really a shame that for this one time Java has a real nice aot
llvm compiler, MS kills it. Being able to compile Java (or any
bytecode language) to a native, fast and small
Good luck to you Erik. I totally agree with you and hope you succeed. If
there's any way I can help, I will do just that.
> On 19 Apr 2016, at 04:39, Erik De Rijcke wrote:
> I'm currently looking if I can get some robovm fork kickstarted. (
Seems there are more forks out there..
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Felix Bembrick
> Good luck to you Erik. I totally agree with you and hope you succeed. If
> there's any way I can help, I will do just that.
In the SwingNode#resize(double, double) documentation, it states:
"Applications should not invoke this method directly. If an application needs
to directly set the size of the SwingNode, it should set the Swing component's
minimum/preferred/maximum size constraints which will
Context management is tightly couple between Glass and Prism. The fix
will likely touches both places.
On 4/16/16, 11:05 AM, Ali Ebrahimi wrote:
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Chien Yang > wrote:
Mail list logo