Building WebKit natives with debug symbols on 32 bit Linux

2014-05-28 Thread Peter Levart
Hi, I'm new to this list and I have searched the archives, but haven't found a discussion about this. If I have missed it, please just direct me to the archived thread. I'm trying to debug a crash in a native part of WebKit-JavaFX bindings (https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-33599). I

Re: Building WebKit natives with debug symbols on 32 bit Linux

2014-05-28 Thread Peter Levart
cross-compiling options too, I guess... Peter On 05/28/2014 03:39 PM, Peter Levart wrote: Hi, I'm new to this list and I have searched the archives, but haven't found a discussion about this. If I have missed it, please just direct me to the archived thread. I'm trying to debug a crash

Re: Building WebKit natives with debug symbols on 32 bit Linux

2014-06-06 Thread Peter Levart
PM, David Hill wrote: On 5/28/14, May 28, 9:47 AM, Peter Levart wrote: Hi Again, The idea that comes to my mind is the following: would it be possible to cross-compile the openjfx on the 64 bit Linux using 64 bit tools, but targeted at 32 bit Linux? What would have to be changed in build

Re: How to suppress platform logger output

2014-09-19 Thread Peter Levart
On 09/19/2014 01:34 PM, Werner Lehmann wrote: Hi, I'd like to use one of the Bindings.select* methods but can't really accept the tons of stderr output it generates for null steps. According to this ticket... [#RT-35957] Bindings class spits out a lot of unneeded log messages

Re: How to suppress platform logger output

2014-09-19 Thread Peter Levart
On 09/19/2014 04:38 PM, Peter Levart wrote: On 09/19/2014 01:34 PM, Werner Lehmann wrote: Hi, I'd like to use one of the Bindings.select* methods but can't really accept the tons of stderr output it generates for null steps. According to this ticket... [#RT-35957] Bindings class spits out

Re: [9] Review request: 8177566: FX user module gets IllegalAccessException from sun.reflect.misc.Trampoline

2017-05-11 Thread Peter Levart
Hi Kevin, On 05/10/2017 03:19 AM, Kevin Rushforth wrote: inline Peter Levart wrote: Hi Kevin, On 05/02/2017 02:21 AM, Kevin Rushforth wrote: This review is being cross-posted to both openjfx-dev and jigsaw-dev. Please review the proposed fix for: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK

Re: [9] Review request: 8177566: FX user module gets IllegalAccessException from sun.reflect.misc.Trampoline

2017-05-07 Thread Peter Levart
Hi Kevin, On 05/02/2017 02:21 AM, Kevin Rushforth wrote: This review is being cross-posted to both openjfx-dev and jigsaw-dev. Please review the proposed fix for: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177566 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8177566/webrev.00/complete-webrev/ Details of

Re: static initialisation of javafx.stage.Screen causing problems with clojure

2019-03-25 Thread Peter Levart
Hi Razvan, I don't know Clojure but if this happens during compilation of Clojure source(s) (in clojure.lang.Compile), then the question is: Does Clojure compiler really need to execute static initializers of classes it is "resolving"? It seems it needs to load the classes (presumably because

Re: static initialisation of javafx.stage.Screen causing problems with clojure

2019-03-27 Thread Peter Levart
to be invoked in special JavaFX Application thread only, then this is where the static initializer will get executed too. It seems that this has not been a problem for normal (Java-side) use. Regards, Peter Regards, Răzvan On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 17:41, Peter Levart wrote: Hi Razvan, I don't