Re: JavaFX versus AWT/Swing Hardware Acceleration

2014-01-03 Thread Steve Hannah
Prism. We do mix HW and SW in that we generate masks from a path in SW, but we cache that on the card and render it using shaders. Can you describe roughly how the caching works? I understand that the alpha mask is stored in OGL as a texture, but there are an infinite number of possible

Re: JavaFX versus AWT/Swing Hardware Acceleration

2014-01-03 Thread Steve Hannah
Are you referring to the C version of Pisces in the FX sources? Actually, there are 2 currently in the FX source base. I'm working with the native Pisces code located in modules/graphics/src/main/native-prism/* I'm just making a 2D graphics API similar in functionality to

Re: Canvas initial delay issue

2014-05-12 Thread Steve Hannah
? Thanks in advance, Renato. -- *Renato Rodrigues Oliveira da Silva* VICG - Visualization, Imaging and Computer Graphics - ICMC - USP São Carlos -- Steve Hannah Web Lite Solutions Corp.

Re: IOS support?

2014-09-09 Thread Steve Hannah
both? Thanks! -Tony -- Steve Hannah Web Lite Solutions Corp.

Re: Differences between WebView and Webkit

2015-06-24 Thread Steve Hannah
forward. Steve On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Steve Hannah st...@weblite.ca wrote: I have a javascript app that is not loading in the JavaFX webview (JDK8). User agent string indicates WebKit 537.44, so I downloaded the nightly build for WebKit 537.44 to test, and the app works

Differences between WebView and Webkit

2015-06-24 Thread Steve Hannah
- or are there some differences? -- Steve Hannah Web Lite Solutions Corp.

Re: Fx questions

2015-10-29 Thread Steve Hannah
jar to ext classpath >>> >>> - when embedding html5 pages into fx apps, should we expect it to >>> render/behave similar to popular browsers like chrome? I'm wondering if >>> we >>> can expect this to just work or if things may be a bit wonky. >>> >>> - do you have a public roadmap for fx? >>> >>> - what is your recommendation for lifecycle management, ie creating >>> controllers with injected dependencies. I saw afterburner looked nice, we >>> have spring working too. >>> >>> - what is status of scenebuilder? Is it supported, and still worked on? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Brian >>> >>> >>> >> -- Steve Hannah Web Lite Solutions Corp.

Re: Java & JavaFX on mobiles

2015-10-07 Thread Steve Hannah
S and > Android from Oracle. > > Will these JDKs be the best and simplest way of running JavaFX on those > platforms? Without JIT support, will these JDKs support AOT compiling? > > Do the proposed JDKs for mobiles even include JavaFX? > > Felix -- Steve Hannah Web Lite Solutions Corp.

Re: What does this mean for the future of JavaFX on iOS?

2016-04-18 Thread Steve Hannah
lix.bembr...@gmail.com> wrote: > So what do they use instead? > > > On 19 Apr 2016, at 02:52, Steve Hannah <st...@weblite.ca> wrote: > > > > According to Gluon, they're not impacted by this. > > https://twitter.com/GluonHQ/status/721784161728471041 > > >

Re: What does this mean for the future of JavaFX on iOS?

2016-04-18 Thread Steve Hannah
his void? Or > is the final nail in the coffin for JavaFX to ever be a truly viable cross > platform technology? > > Thanks, > > Felix -- Steve Hannah Web Lite Solutions Corp.

Re: Packaging DMG with Ant fails on OS-X 10.13.3

2018-02-13 Thread Steve Hannah
e the packaging of JavaFX-DMGs is broken on the latest OS-X > System. Has anyone ancountered the same? > > Tom > -- Steve Hannah Web Lite Solutions Corp.

Re: Packaging DMG with Ant fails on OS-X 10.13.3

2018-02-13 Thread Steve Hannah
I tried that one, but it didn't seem to correct the problem for us. On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 1:44 PM, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com > wrote: > The bug is also fixed in the recently released JDK 8u162. > > -- Kevin > > > Steve Hannah wrote: &g

Re: Packaging DMG with Ant fails on OS-X 10.13.3

2018-02-13 Thread Steve Hannah
reference is fixed in 10. > > -- Kevin > > > Steve Hannah wrote: > > I ran into this bug a couple months ago with javafx packager on High > Sierra.https://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8190758 > > The problem is basically that hdiutil changed its default f

Re: Why cannot run compiled JavaFX 11 class?

2018-10-30 Thread Steve Hannah
add `u+x` in case that was the > issue, but apparently that was not the trouble. > > What's wrong? > > (Yes, `$PATH_TO_FX` does point to `javafx-sdk-11/lib`.) > > —— > Murray Eisenberg mur...@math.umass.edu > Mathematics & Statistics Dept. > University of Massachusetts Amherst > > > > > -- Steve Hannah Web Lite Solutions Corp.

Re: Re: Remove JavaFX JPMS enforcement

2020-04-21 Thread Steve Hannah
ent, but it's a PITA and BS. End users are going to struggle with > > > this, and it prevents JavaFX runtime from being purely managed by > Maven. No > > > other JavaFX version requires this, so it's mind boggling that all of a > > > sudden JavaFX needs this. > > > > > > Poor/buggy IDE support is really the big one here. I don't know about > > > other IDEs but Netbeans DOES NOT provide a project template for > creating a > > > JavaFX application with setup dependencies. Netbeans, when setup with a > > > Maven project, allows you to select an entire project(pom) rather than > the > > > individual dependencies(jar) which doesn't work. What you search for > also > > > matters: if you search for "JavaFX" you will get the wrong search > results. > > > You need to search for "openjfx" which can be confusing. > > > > > > Anyway, yeah, it's a PITA. There is also an issue with Ant based > projects > > > and Netbeans because JavaFX puts its src.zip in a folder that is > supposed > > > to only include the runtime library that has existed for > years(literally a > > > 1 line fix too). No one really uses Ant anymore so it's probably not a > big > > > deal now but yeah, getting JavaFX working hasn't been "include and > done" > > > when it could potentially be that way. > > > > > > > -- Steve Hannah Web Lite Solutions Corp.