Re: Support additional video codec and container format

This would be great to have on JavaFX. I seriously hope they would add it for Java 10 at least, or a later Java 9 update. > Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 20:51:06 +1000 > From: John-Val Rose <johnvalr...@gmail.com> > To: Sverre Moe <sverre@gmail.com> > Cc: openjfx-dev@openj

Re: JEP 311: Java Packager API & CLI (Kevin Rushforth)

The preliminary list of new arguments has arguments for DEB, but not RPM. Really hope RPM is not phased out after refactoring arguments for later removal after JDK10. What is the reason for removing support for Java Web Start (JNLP) in the Java Packager? /Sverre > Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017

Re: javapackager feedback and questions

We are using the javapackager through the gradle/maven javafx plugin, to create: * Executable JAR: When we went from Swing to JavaFX the maven jar plugin could not create an executable JAR capable to start the JavaFX Application. * Native executable bundle: RPM (Linux), EXE (Windows), PKG (Mac) *

Re: Removal of apps/scenebuilder from OpenJFX repo

Looks like Gluon has moved SceneBuilder from Bitbucket for GitHub. https://github.com/gluonhq/scenebuilder I like this move. GitHub is much better to work with. Den fre. 27. apr. 2018 kl. 13:31 skrev Sverre Moe : > > I would like to hear from Gluon about their work on SceneBuilder

Re: JavaFX and it use of GTK3

> > What does GTK have to say for JavaFX (disregard any AWT/Swing and SWT) ? > > FX is not a GTK app from a rendering perspective. > It is used for all needed interaction with the Windowing System Makes sense. For GUI components such as the FileChooser. The FileChooser in JavaFX is using the

JavaFX and it use of GTK3

Pardon me for asking this on the dev mailing list, but I wanted to get this directly from the source. I was glad to read that Java had gotten support for GTK3. Prior to this I was oblivious with JavaFX relationship with GTK, apart from the various Gtk-WARNING when starting applications. Then I

Bug in SceneBuilder 9

I think I have found a bug in SceneBuilder 9. I cannot find an existing bug report for this: https://www.oracle.com/search/results/_/N-8d?Ntt=SceneBuilder%20TitledPane=1=1=bugs=106=S3 When adding a TitledPane, its default styling is not applied. Within SceneBuilder the TitledPane lacks the

Re: More community participation in JavaFX

>> 2018-02-06 14:29 GMT+01:00 dalibor topic : >>> >>> >>> >>> On 02.02.2018 00:26, Kevin Rushforth wrote: We are specifically looking to discuss ideas around the following areas: * Easing barriers to contribution (e.g., making JavaFX easier to

Re: More community participation in JavaFX

> Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 08:11:05 +0100 > From: Alexander Ny?en > To: Kevin Rushforth > Cc: "openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net" > Subject: Re: More community participation in JavaFX > Message-ID:

Re: OpenJFX status update

> > The javapackager tool and associated jdk.packager and > jdk.packager.services modules have been removed from the JDK along with > JavaFX. They are not part of the standalone JavaFX builds. > > -- Kevin > > What options are there if one relies on the javapackager to create native runtime images

Re: JavaFX 11 snapshots in maven sonatype

ame as the module (in module-info.java). > I'm very open to discuss this though, so if you want to start a > discussion, send it to the list? I personally have no real preference for > naming, but it's better to change the name now instead of next year :) > > - Johan > > On Thu, Jul 5

JavaFX dialog window size regression

I filed a bug report a while back. Since I didn't have access I could not comment or update in that issue. https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8179073 With Java 9, a JavaFX dialogs got tiny and did not size up to its content. This worked fine when I was running JDK 9 build 161, but after

Re: Support additional video codec and container format

-summary.html What does it take to implement support for these Video formats? It cannot be a license problem because Java 10 already has x264 as the Only supported video format. Is there any work scheduled to improve on this in JavaFX? Den søn. 10. sep. 2017 kl. 20:49 skrev Sverre Moe : > >

Re: Filling the Packager gap

tor. 27. sep. 2018 kl. 10:42 skrev Sverre Moe : > Den tor. 27. sep. 2018 kl. 00:49 skrev Kevin Rushforth < > kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>: > >> No, jlink won't link in a non-modular application. So the steps are: >> >> 1) Run jlink to create a Java runtime image, possi

Re: Filling the Packager gap

://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8210759 > [2] > https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/blob/jfx-11/doc-files/release-notes-11.md#known-issues > [3] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8210092 > > > On 9/27/2018 9:03 AM, Sverre Moe wrote: > > Without the reli

Re: Filling the Packager gap

Den tor. 27. sep. 2018 kl. 18:50 skrev Kevin Rushforth < kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>: > You mean openjfx11, not JDK 11, right? Backporting this fix would mean an > openjfx 11.x update release would stop building or running with JDK 10. Not > something that would be done lightly, since it would

Later OpenJFX Compatibilty with JDK 11 LTS

On tor. 27. sep. 2018 kl. 18:18 wrote Kevin Rushforth < kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>: > > I missed seeing the swing exception in your earlier message. Yes, the Swing issue is a known problem in openjfx11, JDK-8210759 [1], and is documented in the release notes [2]. > > It will be fixed in openjfx12

Re: Later OpenJFX Compatibilty with JDK 11 LTS

Den tor. 27. sep. 2018 kl. 20:06 skrev Johan Vos : > We would probably target the Java 11 because it is LTS. Changes to JDK will >> be backported up to september 2023 by the community. If we are interested >> in getting updates on OpenJFX also we would then need to always upgrade >> it. >> I

Re: Later OpenJFX Compatibilty with JDK 11 LTS

Den tor. 27. sep. 2018 kl. 22:38 skrev Jan Tosovsky : > On 2018-09-27 Sverre Moe wrote: > > Den tor. 27. sep. 2018 kl. 20:06 skrev Johan Vos >: > > > > > 3. Stick with an LTS release and get commercial support to get updates > > > > > Thanks. Option 3

Re: Filling the Packager gap

I am having some problems accessing the jpackager from symlinks, seems it cannot find the jdk.packager.jar /usr/bin/jpackager -> /etc/alternatives/jpackager /etc/alternatives/jpackager -> /usr/java/jpackager/jpackager :/ # jpackager --help Error occurred during initialization of boot layer

Re: Window opening glitch on ubuntu 18.04

Den tor. 11. okt. 2018 kl. 19:32 skrev Sverre Moe : > Den tor. 11. okt. 2018 kl. 19:17 skrev Kevin Rushforth < > kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>: > >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8212060 >> >> > I have not noticed this on OpenSUSE Leap 15. The windo

Re: Window opening glitch on ubuntu 18.04

Den tor. 11. okt. 2018 kl. 19:17 skrev Kevin Rushforth < kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8212060 > > I have not noticed this on OpenSUSE Leap 15. The window pop up right in the center of my screen in an instant. NVIDIA graphics with NVIDIA proprietary

Re: openJFX11 app deployed in browser?

You also mentioned a "up-to-date" manual. Take a look at javafx-gradle-plugin https://github.com/FibreFoX/javafx-gradle-plugin You can use it to build an JavaFX 8 application with Java Web Start deployment. /Sverre Den man. 22. okt. 2018 kl. 19:20 skrev Sverre Moe : > Yes i

Re: openJFX11 app deployed in browser?

Yes it still works with Java 8 and up to Java 10. The Java Web Start was removed in Java 11. /Sverre Den man. 22. okt. 2018 kl. 19:15 skrev Martin Ciglan : > OK. > > Is it still possible to do it with Java8? > Dňa 22/10/2018 o 19:14 Sverre Moe napísal(a): > > Deploym

Re: openJFX11 app deployed in browser?

Deployment by web browser is no longer possible with Java 11 as they removed Java Web Start. If you want your JavaFX application to run in a web browser, take a look at JPro https://www.jpro.one/. /Sverre Den man. 22. okt. 2018 kl. 14:53 skrev Martin Ciglan : > Hi > > I am developing openJFX11

Re: openJFX11 app deployed in browser?

Den tir. 23. okt. 2018 kl. 07:49 skrev Martin Ciglan : > Thank you, I'll take a look. > > If you say it works up to Java 10, how does it look with browser support. > > Are you able to run JavaFX app in latest versions of Chrome or Firefox? > Thanks. > > You don't have to contend with browser

Maybe a TitledPane bug

I am not sure if I have stumbled upon a bug in JavaFX, or perhaps it is simply something I am doing wrong. After setting the TitledPane title background programmatically, then when hovering the background color is reset to the previous value from CSS. I get same behavior in both JavaFX 8 and

Re: Maybe a TitledPane bug

lookup("*.title"); > titleNode.setBackground(new Background(new > BackgroundFill(Color.GREEN,null,null))); > } > > > > On 10/31/18 6:58 PM, Sverre Moe wrote: > > I am not sure if I have stumbled upon a bug in JavaFX, or perhaps it is > > simply som

Re: Using the jpackager

Den fre. 9. nov. 2018 kl. 16:22 skrev Rachel Greenham : > Build the JRE needed using JLink, supplying the needed modules. The > JLink task referenced is actually written in Java and wraps > ToolProvider, but it's pretty trivial and could almost-more-easily be > done with an Exec. NB: The JLink

Re: Filling the Packager gap

Johan, has there been any new updates to jpackager in JDK12 since you backported it? I have found some problems with jpackager. Perhaps they might have been fixed later. I mentioned this to core-list-dev mailinglist on jpackager thread. 1) The control file for debian package does not set correct

Re: JavaFX 11 on Android

Den tor. 4. okt. 2018 kl. 19:01 skrev Johan Vos : > Hi, > > I worked from the openjfx/develop repository and created a version that > works on Android (will work on iOS soon). > This required some changes, as we're running on top of the Android VM, > which is not really Java (not even close). > >

Re: Cross-platform JavaFX 11 deployment

An all-in-one solution does exist when using OpenJFX as an SDK instead as dependencies from Maven/Gradle. There was a discussion about empty JARs here on the mailingslist. A problem it seemed to be with Gradle and Eclipse The Gradle build instruction for Java 11 suggest setting platform as a

Re: Filling the Packager gap

I have tried this jpackager a bit. It is working fine packaging a Java modular project. However it fails to package a none modular project. I modified my project and removed the modularization and tried again to see if it would work to package our legacy Java 8 project (though now built with JDK

Re: JavaFX 11 is released

acle JDK 11 + OpenJFX 11. > > -- Kevin > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/legal/gplv2+ce.html > > > On 9/19/2018 12:22 AM, Sverre Moe wrote: > > Great work with JavaFX 11. Looking forward to trying it out. > > > > About license for OpenJDK and OpenJFX: > >

Re: Filling the Packager gap

Den tor. 27. sep. 2018 kl. 00:49 skrev Kevin Rushforth < kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>: > No, jlink won't link in a non-modular application. So the steps are: > > 1) Run jlink to create a Java runtime image, possibly stripped down, and > include the javafx.* modules you need > 2) Run jpackager to

Re: Filling the Packager gap

Den fre. 14. des. 2018 kl. 13:47 skrev Johan Vos : > Hi Sverre, > > Scene Builder 11 is built using that backported packager, but not > everything was working yet. > It is not the intention to make a real product based on this backported > code -- we just did it to fill the gap until the jpackage

Re: Filling the Packager gap

Den ons. 19. sep. 2018 kl. 10:56 skrev Johan Vos : > Hi, > > As promised, we looked into an interim solution for the packager-gap. Work > for the new Java Packager (12?) is being done in the OpenJDK sandbox repo. > We backported the required changes to an OpenJDK 11 mirror: >

Re: JavaFX 11 is released

Great work with JavaFX 11. Looking forward to trying it out. About license for OpenJDK and OpenJFX: Given that OpenJDK has a GPLv2-CE license, is it possible to use it with a commercial application, when bundling with a native runtime, or do we need a commercial license from Oracle? We will not

Re: Distributing JavaFX 11 Application

You could use the new jpackage to create a native runtime of your application. The jpackager is now targeted for JDK 13, but can still be used to create a native Java 11 application. You can download an EA build of JDK 13 with jpackage http://jdk.java.net/jpackage/ You would need to build on

Bug in TreeTableView rendering

I think I have found a bug/regression with Java 11 regarding TreeTableView. This has worked fine on JavaFX 8, but is messed up with JavaFX 11. 1) The arrow button is on the text 2) No text indentation levels: Each row (no matter the level) is at the left edge of the TreeTableView. I can file an

JavaFX 11 Web Module Linux Requires libavcodec-ffmpeg

Building an JavaFX application with the jpackage tools adds many additional Linux RPM Requires. Among these are libavcodec56 and libavcodec-ffmpeg56. It is ffmpeg2 that has libavcodec56, but the libavcodec-ffmpeg is nowhere to be found. It does not seem to exist. If building an Java runtime

Re: JavaFX 11 Web Module Linux Requires libavcodec-ffmpeg

so.57 which is among the requires (version 56 and 57). > > On 9/19/2019 1:52 AM, Sverre Moe wrote: > > Building an JavaFX application with the jpackage tools adds many > additional > > Linux RPM Requires. > > > > Among these are libavcodec56 and libavcodec-ff

Re: Bug in TreeTableView rendering

e tracker enabled, which should help avoid this confusion. > > -- Kevin > > [1] https://bugreport.java.com/ > [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/ > [3] https://github.com/openjdk/ > > On 9/30/2019 3:08 AM, Sverre Moe wrote: > > I have created an issue for this on

Re: Bug in TreeTableView rendering

I have created an issue for this on GitHub. https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/issues/607 /Sverre man. 26. aug. 2019 kl. 20:03 skrev Sverre Moe : > I think I have found a bug/regression with Java 11 regarding TreeTableView. > This has worked fine on JavaFX 8, but is mes

Re: Request for permission to backport fixes to jfx-11

Could JavaFX 11 also get backported the fix related for JDK-8193502? It might have been solved in the fix for JDK-8179073. I noticed this regression right after JDK 9 build 161. Recently also JavaFX 8 got this regression after update 181. It seems this was fixed in JavaFX 13. I asked on GitHub

Re: Bug in TreeTableView rendering

A comment on the JDK-8231644 issue was added by Jeanette Winzenburg https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8231644 > hmm .. no testing done but: the data object looks pathological - it's always problematic to have nodes as data (even though technically possible). That will explode with the

Re: RFR: 8193445: JavaFX CSS is applied redundantly leading to significant performance degradation

On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 09:22:04 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 16:45:04 GMT, Ajit Ghaisas wrote: > >> **Issue :** >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193445 >> >> **Background :** >> The CSS performance improvement done in >>

Re: JavaFX dialog window size regression

/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/pull/456 /Sverre tor. 26. apr. 2018 kl. 21:35 skrev Sverre Moe : > I filed a bug report a while back. Since I didn't have access I could > not comment or update in that issue. > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8179073 > > With Java 9, a JavaF