Re: Problems building openjfx

2018-11-08 Thread Michael Ennen
Indeed it requires choco package manager and it is meant to be run in powershell. Thank you for taking the time to report what worked for you. If there are any changes you think should be added to the script, feel free to open a PR on https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx as it is now

Re: Problems building openjfx

2018-11-08 Thread Dean Wookey
Hi Johan, Michael's build script helped me a lot. I'm on windows 10. It just runs in powershell after installing chocolatey, (.\tools\scripts\build1.ps from the openjdk root dir). The only environment variables I've got set are JAVA_HOME/JDK_HOME. I did have to make some modifications however to

Re: Problems building openjfx

2018-11-02 Thread Johan Vos
Hi Michael, What environment do you use to run that Windows build script? The windows builds are the ones I still feel least comfortable about. We tried to automate those on AdoptOpenJDK infrastructure, but they are using Ansible for provisioning machines (for very good reasons), and we spent

Re: Problems building openjfx

2018-11-01 Thread Michael Ennen
Also don't forget about the Windows build script: https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/blob/develop/tools/scripts/build.ps1 It is what I use to automate the process of building OpenJFX on Windows as much as possible. Any improvements to the script would be appreciated. On Wed, Oct 31,

RE: Problems building openjfx

2018-11-01 Thread carl
Cc: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net Mailing Subject: Re: Problems building openjfx On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 7:34 PM Nir Lisker mailto:nlis...@gmail.com> > wrote: I think we should focus on 11 on the wiki, so it's really good you have instructions for 8 on your site. But the 11 instru

Re: Problems building openjfx

2018-11-01 Thread Johan Vos
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 7:34 PM Nir Lisker wrote: > I think we should focus on 11 on the wiki, so it's really good you have >> instructions for 8 on your site. But the 11 instructions on the wiki >> should >> be working for everyone who wants to build 11. > > > There are instructions for 8 on

Re: Problems building openjfx

2018-10-31 Thread Nir Lisker
> > I think we should focus on 11 on the wiki, so it's really good you have > instructions for 8 on your site. But the 11 instructions on the wiki should > be working for everyone who wants to build 11. There are instructions for 8 on the wiki too, though I don't know if they are correct. As for

Re: Problems building openjfx

2018-10-31 Thread Johan Vos
Your site says these are for 8, but I assume it is very similar to 11? If so, we should probably update the wiki with the instructions on your site. Are there any particular parts of the wiki where you think corrections are needed? I think we should focus on 11 on the wiki, so it's really good you

Re: Problems building openjfx

2018-10-31 Thread Kevin Rushforth
Make it so. :) -- Kevin On 10/31/2018 8:26 AM, faste...@swingempire.de wrote: yes, I think so - don't have it and nothing barked at me Zitat von Nir Lisker : Can I remove the step for "DirectX SDK June 2010"? I think it was already verified that it's not needed. - Nir On Wed, Oct 31,

Re: Problems building openjfx

2018-10-31 Thread fastegal
yes, I think so - don't have it and nothing barked at me Zitat von Nir Lisker : Can I remove the step for "DirectX SDK June 2010"? I think it was already verified that it's not needed. - Nir On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 4:59 PM wrote: wasn't as bad as expected, just had to interrupt because

Re: Problems building openjfx

2018-10-31 Thread carl
I've been pulling the latest and building successfully on Windows for the past week. Here's a supplement to the official docs. https://courses.bekwam.net/public_tutorials/bkcourse_building_openjfx_8_win. html -Carl

Re: Problems building openjfx

2018-10-31 Thread Nir Lisker
Can I remove the step for "DirectX SDK June 2010"? I think it was already verified that it's not needed. - Nir On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 4:59 PM wrote: > > wasn't as bad as expected, just had to interrupt because it took ages > to test the webkit (which wasn't build so all its tests ran until

Re: Problems building openjfx

2018-10-31 Thread fastegal
wasn't as bad as expected, just had to interrupt because it took ages to test the webkit (which wasn't build so all its tests ran until each timed out) Task :web:test * WARNING: running web tests without building webkit. The webkit

Re: Problems building openjfx

2018-10-31 Thread fastegal
okay after deleting the properties and running again, it at least lists the tasks without error - thanks :) now will try a real build - expecting all hell breaking loose Zitat von faste...@swingempire.de: thanks for the quick answer :) hmm, those are nearly all empty:

Re: Problems building openjfx

2018-10-31 Thread fastegal
forgot the link to the instruction page, just in case there's another: https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Building+OpenJFX#BuildingOpenJFX-EnvironmentVariables Zitat von faste...@swingempire.de: first try, following the instructions (for win10) at: that is having downloaded,

Problems building openjfx

2018-10-31 Thread fastegal
first try, following the instructions (for win10) at: that is having downloaded, installed the required tools, added env vars as desribed. Then in cygwin, navigate to the git working dir, typing gradle tasks fails with: FAILURE: Build failed with an exception. * Where: Script