January 18, 2019 2:48 PM, "Ty Young" wrote:
> The documentation on the sizing says that they override the computed size.
Computed size refers to Region.USE_COMPUTED_SIZE which causes a node to compute
its intrinsic or default size if given infinite space. Basically, you want a
button with 4
On 1/17/19 12:55 PM, Siddhesh Rane wrote:
January 16, 2019 11:31 PM, "Ty Young" wrote:
How else is percentage based UI sizing besides DoubleBinding(s)? Isn't column
restraints just the
same thing but aligns everything to a column?
I have to ask(again) as to why minWidth/maxWidth,
January 16, 2019 11:31 PM, "Ty Young" wrote:
> How else is percentage based UI sizing besides DoubleBinding(s)? Isn't column
> restraints just the
> same thing but aligns everything to a column?
>
> I have to ask(again) as to why minWidth/maxWidth, minHeight/maxHeight,
> prefWidth/prefHeight
On 1/15/19 6:36 PM, Ty Young wrote:
In otherwords, similar to double and triple buffering. Of course, just
like with double/triple buffering this can cause side affects.
Yes, JavaFX does all that. I was trying to help out by informing you of
at least one concurrency bug between the
On 1/13/19 5:33 PM, John Neffenger wrote:
On 1/12/19 10:20 PM, Ty Young wrote:
Seeing as how this important issue is seemingly being ignored, I've
decided to upload a video showcases the bugs[1]. If this isn't
evidence that there is a problem with JavaFX's content rendering,
resizing, and
Seeing as how this important issue is seemingly being ignored, I've
decided to upload a video showcases the bugs[1]. If this isn't evidence
that there is a problem with JavaFX's content rendering, resizing, and
fonts I don't know what is.
The issues I'm experiencing affect every single
On 1/9/19 2:38 AM, Ty Young wrote:
On 1/9/19 1:59 AM, Tom Schindl wrote:
On 09.01.19 06:13, Ty Young wrote:
I've done a fresh build of JavaFX 12 and JDK 13(12 hasn't been released
yet but apparently 13 is a thing). These issues still exist.
To really help finding and solving the problem you
On 09.01.19 06:13, Ty Young wrote:
> I've done a fresh build of JavaFX 12 and JDK 13(12 hasn't been released
> yet but apparently 13 is a thing). These issues still exist.
>
To really help finding and solving the problem you need to provide
source code for us to reproduce the problem.
Tom
--
I've done a fresh build of JavaFX 12 and JDK 13(12 hasn't been released
yet but apparently 13 is a thing). These issues still exist.
Unrelated to JavaFX but client builds of the JDK fail with config
--disable-warnings-as-errors --with-jvm-variants=client
On 1/6/19 5:06 AM, Siddhesh Rane wrote:
(An earlier version of this email turned out completely empty when delivered on
the mailing list)
I have used JavaFX on Linux since 8.0 and have never faced any serious issues.
January 3, 2019 4:29 AM, "Ty Young" wrote:
In my attempt to write a
(An earlier version of this email turned out completely empty when delivered on
the mailing list)
I have used JavaFX on Linux since 8.0 and have never faced any serious issues.
January 3, 2019 4:29 AM, "Ty Young" wrote:
> In my attempt to write a more proper responsive JavaFX UI, I've created
On 1/2/19 6:27 PM, Ty Young wrote:
(I'm too lazy to make different emails for every bug so I've just
thrown them in a single email. Hopefully that isn't a big deal.)
In my attempt to write a more proper responsive JavaFX UI, I've
created a new JavaFX project which extensively uses
13 matches
Mail list logo