Re: RE24 testing call #1 (2.4.46) LMDB RE0.9 testing call #1 (0.9.22)

--On Thursday, February 15, 2018 10:45 PM +0100 Michael Ströder wrote: Howard Chu wrote: We can schedule it for .47, and .47 can be pushed out shortly after .46. We can also include other minor non-core enhancements in.47 (like back-sock extensions) as well. Hmm, the

Re: RE24 testing call #1 (2.4.46) LMDB RE0.9 testing call #1 (0.9.22)

On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 01:11:09PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: OpenLDAP 2.4.46 Engineering 'make check' passed on Debian unstable with the Debian build flags (via dpkg-buildflags(1)) and configure options [1]. Will try to squeeze in some manual testing, maybe this weekend... [1]

Re: RE24 testing call #1 (2.4.46) LMDB RE0.9 testing call #1 (0.9.22)

Howard Chu wrote: > We can schedule it for .47, and .47 can be pushed out shortly after .46. > We can also include other minor non-core enhancements in.47 (like > back-sock extensions) as well. Hmm, the back-sock changes are well tested and do not have any incompatible impact. When .47 would be

making ldap_pvt.h public (was: Re: RE24 testing call #1 (2.4.46) LMDB RE0.9 testing call #1 (0.9.22))

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 09:09:53AM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: The "ldap.h" file is specifically for RFC defined interfaces. I discussed this with Howard, and we thought that the best way to address this issue would be to rename "ldap_pvt.h" to "openldap.h", to indicate that the methods

Re: RE24 testing call #1 (2.4.46) LMDB RE0.9 testing call #1 (0.9.22)

Alexander Bokovoy wrote: On Thu, 15 Feb 2018, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: --On Monday, February 12, 2018 6:33 AM +0200 Alexander Bokovoy wrote: It would really help Samba if ITS#8671 "Declare ldap_init_fd() in ldap.h to help external consumers" would make a release too.

Re: RE24 testing call #1 (2.4.46) LMDB RE0.9 testing call #1 (0.9.22)

On Thu, 15 Feb 2018, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: --On Monday, February 12, 2018 6:33 AM +0200 Alexander Bokovoy wrote: It would really help Samba if ITS#8671 "Declare ldap_init_fd() in ldap.h to help external consumers" would make a release too. It is not a code change,

Re: RE24 testing call #1 (2.4.46) LMDB RE0.9 testing call #1 (0.9.22)

--On Monday, February 12, 2018 6:33 AM +0200 Alexander Bokovoy wrote: It would really help Samba if ITS#8671 "Declare ldap_init_fd() in ldap.h to help external consumers" would make a release too. It is not a code change, only a documentation update but it would have

Re: RE24 testing call #1 (2.4.46) LMDB RE0.9 testing call #1 (0.9.22)

Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > At this point, I believe we're ready to being testing for a 2.4.46 > release. I know 2.4.x should not add new features. But these two ITS patches run well in production, affect only back-sock and would avoid that I have to use backport-patches: (ITS#8714) RFE:

Re: RE24 testing call #1 (2.4.46) LMDB RE0.9 testing call #1 (0.9.22)

On su, 11 helmi 2018, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: Hello everyone, At this point, I believe we're ready to being testing for a 2.4.46 release. The primary focus on this release has been to fix several long standing issues with replication, both for "standard" and "delta" based syncrepl. These

RE24 testing call #1 (2.4.46) LMDB RE0.9 testing call #1 (0.9.22)

Hello everyone, At this point, I believe we're ready to being testing for a 2.4.46 release. The primary focus on this release has been to fix several long standing issues with replication, both for "standard" and "delta" based syncrepl. These fixes have been tested against databases and