On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 02:15:40PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
> I'm not sure you're trying to solve the right problem yet. I'm pretty
> unconvinced that account lockout is a good solution to anything, in
> general. That's why I added login rate control to the latest ppolicy draft,
> where the DSA
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 02:15:40PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
I'm not sure you're trying to solve the right problem yet. I'm pretty
unconvinced that account lockout is a good solution to anything, in
general. That's why I added login rate control to the latest ppolicy draft,
Brett @Google wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Howard Chu mailto:h...@symas.com>> wrote:
In the case of a local, load-balanced cluster of replicas, where the
network latency between DSAs is very low, the natural coalescing of
updates may not occur as often. Still, it would be
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Howard Chu wrote:
> In the case of a local, load-balanced cluster of replicas, where the
> network latency between DSAs is very low, the natural coalescing of updates
> may not occur as often. Still, it would be better if the updates didn't
> happen at all. And in
