Re: Status of ldap_init_fd and LDAP_PROTO_EXT?

On ti, 19 syys 2017, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: --On Wednesday, June 07, 2017 8:09 AM +0300 Alexander Bokovoy wrote: We'd like to use ldap_init_fd() in Samba and if it is OK to use it, may be moving it to is a good solution? A small update -- get back to use 'struct

Re: Status of ldap_init_fd and LDAP_PROTO_EXT?

--On Wednesday, June 07, 2017 8:09 AM +0300 Alexander Bokovoy wrote: We'd like to use ldap_init_fd() in Samba and if it is OK to use it, may be moving it to is a good solution? A small update -- get back to use 'struct ldap **ldp' in ldap_pvt.h header instead of 'LDAP

Re: Status of ldap_init_fd and LDAP_PROTO_EXT?

Hi, On 08.05.2017 15:10, Volker Lendecke wrote: On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 11:57:28AM +0100, Howard Chu wrote: Generally, was only supposed to export the "official" LDAP API and anything that was specific to OpenLDAP's implementation was stashed in as non-standard features. I suppose the

Re: Status of ldap_init_fd and LDAP_PROTO_EXT?

On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 11:57:28AM +0100, Howard Chu wrote: > Generally, was only supposed to export the "official" LDAP API and > anything that was specific to OpenLDAP's implementation was stashed in > as non-standard features. I suppose the distinction is somewhat > meaningless these days

Re: Status of ldap_init_fd and LDAP_PROTO_EXT?

Volker Lendecke wrote: Hi! What's the status of those two? They are mentioned in the manpages of for example Debian Jessie and FreeBSD 11 (maybe from ports?), but the manpage explicitly says you have to #include , which is not shipped. What's the reason of them being in ldap_pvt.h? Are they

Status of ldap_init_fd and LDAP_PROTO_EXT?

Hi! What's the status of those two? They are mentioned in the manpages of for example Debian Jessie and FreeBSD 11 (maybe from ports?), but the manpage explicitly says you have to #include , which is not shipped. What's the reason of them being in ldap_pvt.h? Are they supposed to change in the