die...@dkluenter.de wrote:
Full_Name:
Version: 2.4.33
OS: openSuSE-12.3-x86_64
URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/
Submission from: (NULL) (91.65.235.202)
the pwdAttribute type requires a syntax of 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.38,
according to man slapo-ppolicy and ppolicy.schema.
when
Full_Name: Tamás Kenéz
Version: LMDB 8eef7a42
OS: windows 7
URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/
Submission from: (NULL) (82.141.191.242)
Using the LMDB library (commit 8eef7a4275eda) on windows 7:
To reproduce: Run mtest multiple times.
The test sometimes fails with the with the windows error
Full_Name: Quanah Gibson-Mount
Version: 2.4.35
OS: Linux 2.6
URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/
Submission from: (NULL) (75.111.39.181)
With back-mdb, if you add a large number of users to the database (via ldapadd),
and then delete them (via ldapmodify), the DB explodes in size.
After the
--On Friday, April 05, 2013 11:36 PM + l...@ualberta.ca wrote:
Full_Name: Leo Mocofan
Version: 2.4.31
OS: Debian Testing
URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/
Submission from: (NULL) (129.128.11.107)
If you are going to test back-mdb, then you need to use a current OpenLDAP
release
--047d7b414c2ebdcec404d9a84c9d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi Quanah,
I have started doing tests with Gentoo Linux running openldap 2.4.35, glibc
2.16 and linux kernel 3.4, 3.8 and 3.9-rc5. I have tried ext2, ext4,
reiserfs and jfs. Ldapadd is still very slow compared to BSD
--On Friday, April 05, 2013 8:52 PM -0600 - lidutu l...@ualberta.ca wrote:
Hi Quanah,
I have started doing tests with Gentoo Linux running openldap 2.4.35,
glibc 2.16 and linux kernel 3.4, 3.8 and 3.9-rc5. I have tried ext2,
ext4, reiserfs and jfs. Ldapadd is still very slow compared to
