> Samuel Tran wrote:
>> On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 11:25 -0400, Samuel Tran wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I am testing OL 2.3.6 + BerkeleyDB 4.2.52 on Debian Sarge boxes.
>> >
>> > I am a little bit confused on the new slapd.d configuration format.
>> >
>> >
>> > I have a slapd.conf file that is workin
Samuel Tran wrote:
Samuel Tran wrote:
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 11:25 -0400, Samuel Tran wrote:
Hi all,
I am testing OL 2.3.6 + BerkeleyDB 4.2.52 on Debian Sarge boxes.
I am a little bit confused on the new slapd.d configuration format.
I have a slapd.conf file that is working with
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Friday, August 26, 2005 4:07 PM -0400 Samuel Tran
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The debugging output is actually the result of my ldapsearch:
/usr/local/bin/ldapsearch -LLL -x -H ldap://localhost -b
"dc=example,dc=com"
Sorry about the confusion.
Any hints?
Is y
--On Friday, August 26, 2005 4:07 PM -0400 Samuel Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
The debugging output is actually the result of my ldapsearch:
/usr/local/bin/ldapsearch -LLL -x -H ldap://localhost -b
"dc=example,dc=com"
Sorry about the confusion.
Any hints?
Is your database configured t
Note that ITS#3764 and #3703 are relevant here, both fixed in 2.2.27.
You should really be running the latest release, 2.2.28 (or 2.3.6). With
the fixes for these two ITS's it should be completely safe to run
slapcat concurrently with slapd.
Ran Li wrote:
Hi Quanah,
Thanks for following my i
Samuel Tran wrote:
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 11:25 -0400, Samuel Tran wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am testing OL 2.3.6 + BerkeleyDB 4.2.52 on Debian Sarge boxes.
>
> I am a little bit confused on the new slapd.d configuration format.
>
>
> I have a slapd.conf file that is working with my setup. I converte
Hi Quanah,
Thanks for following my issue, I sincerely appreciate your effort, I
appologize I did not pay attention to the -h option, after running that
everything works fine, now I can get the output. I m not sure if the
reason was I ran slapcat when slapd was running, but I will avoid this
kind o
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 11:25 -0400, Samuel Tran wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am testing OL 2.3.6 + BerkeleyDB 4.2.52 on Debian Sarge boxes.
>
> I am a little bit confused on the new slapd.d configuration format.
>
> I have a slapd.conf file that is working with my setup. I converted it
> to the new sla
Pierangelo Masarati schrieb:
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Is it possible to set up OpenLDAP in a way:
1) a client connects to a slave, and wants to write something,
2) slave connects to the master,
3) slave writes the change on behalf of the client, and gets the
changes back
4) client is notifi
--On Friday, August 26, 2005 3:19 PM -0400 Ran Li
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello List,
when I ran slapcat (w/ or w/o slapd), it would not return the complete
ldif file, and it just hung. If I do ldapsearch for one entry, in a few
cases it will give the complete result but most of the time
Hello List,
when I ran slapcat (w/ or w/o slapd), it would not return the complete
ldif file, and it just hung. If I do ldapsearch for one entry, in a few
cases it will give the complete result but most of the time it won't,
and it will hang up. slapd log or system log does not say anything. Ran
d
Juan Carlos Sanchez Recio writes:
> Buenas,
That's one language I don't understand, but:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] openldap]# ldapsearch -x -b'' -s base '(objectclass=*)'
> namingContexts
ldapsearch can't tell the difference between -b and -b'', it receives
both as one "-b" argument. So it takes "-s"
Cut and paste the Admin Guide example. You need a space after -b option.
(If anybody can translate this, I'm sure it would be appreciated.)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] openldap]# ldapsearch -x -b'' -s base '(objectclass=*)'
> namingContexts
No. Use ldapsearch -x -b '' -s base '(objectclass=*)' namingCon
Buenas,
acabo de instalar y configurar OpenLDAP 2.23.X, mirando el manual he
probado esto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] openldap]# ldapsearch -x -b'' -s base '(objectclass=*)'
namingContexts
el resultat es això:
# extended LDIF
#
# LDAPv3
# base <-s> with scope sub
# filter: (objectclass=*)
# requesting: b
Hi all,
I am testing OL 2.3.6 + BerkeleyDB 4.2.52 on Debian Sarge boxes.
I am a little bit confused on the new slapd.d configuration format.
I have a slapd.conf file that is working with my setup. I converted it
to the new slapd.d format using this command:
/usr/local/libexec/slapd -f /etc/open
Can I use 2 "unique" overlays (with different base and attrs) in one
database? over_db_config() warns that the freshly added overlay already
is in the list, and a note at that warning in backover.c says:
NOTE: if the overlay already exists, there is no way to merge the
results of the conf
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Is it possible to set up OpenLDAP in a way:
1) a client connects to a slave, and wants to write something,
2) slave connects to the master,
3) slave writes the change on behalf of the client, and gets the
changes back
4) client is notified, that the change was done
Is it possible to set up OpenLDAP in a way:
1) a client connects to a slave, and wants to write something,
2) slave connects to the master,
3) slave writes the change on behalf of the client, and gets the changes
back
4) client is notified, that the change was done
I have an application in ma
18 matches
Mail list logo
