Re: SUMMARY: Re: cachesize does not exceed 1000 entries

2005-09-02 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Saturday, September 03, 2005 7:12 AM +0530 Sameer N Ingole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Robert Petkus wrote: Folks, I finally found the problem after much frustration --> Solaris. Once I tried the same query on Linux and was able to retrieve >1000 entries I figured the problem was with

Re: SUMMARY: Re: cachesize does not exceed 1000 entries

2005-09-02 Thread Sameer N Ingole
Robert Petkus wrote: Folks, I finally found the problem after much frustration --> Solaris. Once I tried the same query on Linux and was able to retrieve >1000 entries I figured the problem was with the ldap client on Solaris. Looking in the logs, Solaris was using paged results from back-bdb

Threads, redux

2005-09-02 Thread Ben Beuchler
I'm trying to decide if my slapd's hunger for threads is acceptable or a sign of some underlying pathology. I work at a small college with around 1000 users. We're using LDAP to provide network authentication for ~200 OS X workstations and 1000 email accounts (providing both mailbox information t

Re: Question pertaining to PPolicy overlay feature

2005-09-02 Thread Howard Chu
Shawn McKinney wrote: Thanks. I would like to make one correction to my earlier post that stated: My question is, for situations when the user account is locked, how do we reset the user account programatically? I have found leaving the pwdReset flag alone will not unlock the user's accou

SUMMARY: Re: cachesize does not exceed 1000 entries

2005-09-02 Thread Robert Petkus
Folks, I finally found the problem after much frustration --> Solaris. Once I tried the same query on Linux and was able to retrieve >1000 entries I figured the problem was with the ldap client on Solaris. Looking in the logs, Solaris was using paged results from back-bdb. When doing an ldap

Adding problem using ldapadd

2005-09-02 Thread Johnny Gonzalez
Hello Everybody, I'm trying to add an entry (at the end you will find the text of the ldiff file) to my tree using ldapadd. but I get this error: adding new entry "serialNumber=8,cn=prueba,ou=Internet,o=Ubiquando,c=CO" ldapadd: update failed: serialNumber=8,cn=prueba,ou=Internet,o=Ubiquando,c=CO

Re: Fault-tolerance for master OpenLDAP server

2005-09-02 Thread Diego de Felice
> > I'm facing the same problem in these days. I'm using Heartbeat and > > the problem is that when the failed node comes back Heartbeat doesn't > > start it automatically as slave. I'll try to put a script that starts > > OpenLDAP automatically as slave at boot time and see what happens. > > Then