Digant C Kasundra wrote:
In our own research at UTA we found this to be true. There are a
handful of aspects that make AD problematic from the LDAP standpoint.
It is also problematic when you want to use it even for Authentication
and Authorization of machines not running Windows.
Hi, have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Or perhaps it's possible to configure OpenLDAP in a way, that we can
temporarily edit slave database when the connection to the master
is broken, and when the connection is back, changes are sent to the
master, which in
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Howard Chu schrieb:
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Wednesday, July 13, 2005 2:49 PM +0200 Tomasz Chmielewski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recently, when planning to deploy a directory server, I was
confronted with someone claiming that OpenLDAP performs poorly,
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Wednesday, July 13, 2005 12:48 PM -0400 Igor Brezac [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Benchmark that matters is the one you perform.
Yes and no. Certainly, taking at look at how things perform for what you
plan to deploy can be quite
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Igor Brezac wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
Qualitative statements about the general performance of
any set of given Directory Servers can be made if you make everything the
same as much as is feasibly possible.
I do not see this being realistic.
Igor,
We at Symas Corporation completely agree with you. Our benchmarks are
intended to be indicative. As data points, they help us understand
the relative performance among various products, platforms, releases
and options. They are factual, rigorous, accurate, and, in the end,
only
Hi all,
I would like to add my two cents to this no doubt interesting
discussion. I think my two cents will be valuable as I am running about
50 instances of OpenLDAP servers in company of huge size with huge
amount of data (per directory).
1) OpenLDAP is rock solid and damned stable. We run it
Hallo again,
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 11:19 +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
(...)
On the other hand, there seems to be
much overhead concerned with additional data that goes around to keep
this multimaster state in sync.
And here is where the argument really falls down - all
--On Wednesday, July 13, 2005 2:49 PM +0200 Tomasz Chmielewski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recently, when planning to deploy a directory server, I was confronted
with someone claiming that OpenLDAP performs poorly, when compared to
Active Directory, and thus, we should choose AD.
I tried
