Is there an application that supports both email based self
registration and OpenLDAP storage of the account data?
What is the current OLC way to replace the nis schema with the
rfc2307bis schema?
There are hacks published, but I couldn't find a document that takes
advantage of OLC, removes the nis schema, and installs the rfc2307bis
schema. It feels like something that I would do often enough that I
would w
Hello,
My question,
I have a meta backend that work perfectly but on the dev team somebody
ask me :
Why on AD this organizationalUnit have these valuies on attrs :
managedBy: CN=Surname Name,OU=Users,DC=domain,DC=fr
seeAlso: CN=Sunrame2 Name2,OU=Users,DC=domain,DC=fr
and on meta on
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 01:08:17PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
> OK, I have narrowed things down to slapd and sssd not playing nice with each
> other. slapd is able to listen on ldaps (port 636) and accept SSL
> connections
> (eg from openssl s_client and other applications using straight SSL).
richard lucassen wrote:
> I was afraid that my own "c" would inherit the MUST
> of the original "c" as well.
Attribute types only inherit from their SUP attribute type. There's no
MUST in an attribute type description.
Object classes inherit the MUST from their SUP object classes.
But if you defi
Am Sonntag, 01. Oktober 2017 20:12 CEST, richard lucassen
schrieb:
> Ok, I'll try that, I was afraid that my own "c" would inherit the MUST
> of the original "c" as well.
Attributes don't have MUST or MAY - Object class definitions regulate
MUST/MAY.
Cheers, Ralf Mattes
On Sun, 1 Oct 2017 10:27:41 +0200
Michael Ströder wrote:
> > But I have to give it a different name (e.g. "cty") though, right or
> > wrong?
>
> No. Why?
>
> An object class description may reference any attribute type
> description present in the schema (and defined in configuration
> _before_
richard lucassen wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 15:30:07 +0200
> Michael Ströder wrote:
>
>>> BTW: I tried to use the "c" attribute in my AUXILIARY objectclass,
>>> but slapd complains that it conflicts with the existing "c". I
>>> suppose this is because I applied different properties to it?
>>
>>
