Hi Quanah,
I just found an old post of yours, and I'd be interested to know if and
how you solved that problem, because I ran into the same need.
Thanks
Ben
* *To*: *openldap-de...@openldap.org
mailto:openldap-devel%40OpenLDAP.org*
* *Subject*: *valsort telephoneNumber*
* *From*:
IMO this example clearly shows that the {} approach is a hack limited to
certain use-cases (e.g. ACLs etc. in back-config).
Ciao, Michael.
Benin Technologies wrote:
Hi Quanah,
I just found an old post of yours, and I'd be interested to know if and how
you solved that problem, because I ran
thanks, I agree, first I thought that weighted valsort could be used to
give an importance grade to a set of attributes, but I agree, it seems
it is of much limited use
(other limitation : it's quite impossible to delete/modify a weighted
entry, because you need to include the weight ({3} for
--On Monday, February 11, 2013 09:42:55 PM +0100 Benin Technologies
benintechnolog...@yahoo.fr wrote:
thanks, I agree, first I thought that weighted valsort could be used
to give an importance grade to a set of attributes, but I agree, it
seems it is of much limited use
(other limitation :
IMO this example clearly shows that the {} approach is a hack limited to
certain use-cases (e.g. ACLs etc. in back-config).
Perhaps valsort could return weights instead of stripping them off when
the RFC 3296 manageDSAit control is used.
p.
--
Pierangelo Masarati
Associate Professor
--On Monday, February 11, 2013 09:42:55 PM +0100 Benin Technologies
benintechnolog...@yahoo.fr wrote:
thanks, I agree, first I thought that weighted valsort could be used
to give an importance grade to a set of attributes, but I agree, it
seems it is of much limited use
(other
--On Monday, February 11, 2013 10:11 PM +0100 Pierangelo Masarati
masar...@aero.polimi.it wrote:
IMO this example clearly shows that the {} approach is a hack limited to
certain use-cases (e.g. ACLs etc. in back-config).
Perhaps valsort could return weights instead of stripping them off
thanks for that info
how do you use that control ? I tried the following :
ldapsearch -x -W -D cn=admin,dc=company,dc=com -b
ou=people,dc=company,dc=com -s subtree -e 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.666.5.14
I get :
# search result
search: 2
result: 2 Protocol error
text: valSort control value is absent
--On Monday, February 11, 2013 10:22 PM +0100 Pierangelo Masarati
masar...@aero.polimi.it wrote:
To perform a search that returns the weighted values the control
LDAP_CONTROL_VALSORT (1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.666.5.14) must be specified.
That's not documented in slapo-valsort(5), as far as I know.
--On Monday, February 11, 2013 10:53:05 PM +0100 Benin Technologies
benintechnolog...@yahoo.fr wrote:
thanks for that info
how do you use that control ? I tried the following :
ldapsearch -x -W -D cn=admin,dc=company,dc=com -b
ou=people,dc=company,dc=com -s subtree -e
thanks for that perl snippet
it would be great to make it work with ldapsearch though, I'll make
another post to see if someone has ever used it with ldapsearch
Le 12/02/2013 00:33, Bill MacAllister a écrit :
--On Monday, February 11, 2013 10:53:05 PM +0100 Benin Technologies
11 matches
Mail list logo
