I believe that this is an important feature as people expect to be able
to correctly display images taken directly from their phones.
At our church, we have encountered this bug at least twice, and we have
had to use the system photo viewer instead. This is not seamless and is
unnecessarily
** Changed in: openlp
Assignee: (unassigned) => Tim Bentley (trb143)
** Changed in: openlp
Milestone: None => a7
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenLP
Core, which is subscribed to OpenLP.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1797121
Title:
Android app
A note for completeness: There are at least two Apache 2.0 licensed
transitive dependencies: python-editor, pbr. I only checked the
transitive dependencies that are exposed as install_requires.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenLP
Core, which is subscribed to
** Branch linked: lp:openlp/packaging
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenLP
Core, which is subscribed to OpenLP.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1797132
Title:
Windows and macOS installer license violations
Status in OpenLP:
New
Bug description:
The
** Branch linked: lp:openlp/android2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenLP
Core, which is subscribed to OpenLP.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1797121
Title:
Android app license violations
Status in OpenLP:
New
Bug description:
Similar to bug
Speaking only about the projector -
The reason 2.4 did not open a socket and listen for projectors is
because PJLink did not have an option to broadcast projector status
packets - by design, PJLink version 1 would only talk to controllers
that had opened a TCP connection directly to the
** Description changed:
- Similar to issue #1795876, the GPLv2 only Android app has some license
+ Similar to bug #1795876, the GPLv2 only Android app has some license
violations. Several Apache 2.0 libraries by Google are used. This can be
fixed by using almost any software license except
Public bug reported:
The Windows and macOS installers contain even more license violations than bug
#1795876.
You redistribute the dependencies with these installers and I cannot see any
license being documented other than OpenLP's own GPLv2. In general even
"liberal" free software licenses
Public bug reported:
Similar to issue #1795876, the GPLv2 only Android app has some license
violations. Several Apache 2.0 libraries by Google are used. This can be
fixed by using almost any software license except GPLv2 only. Just
adding the "or later" clause to the license would be enough.
**
I permit any code of mine to be relicensed to GPLv3+
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenLP
Core, which is subscribed to OpenLP.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1795876
Title:
License violations
Status in OpenLP:
New
Bug description:
OpenLP (GPLv2 only)
10 matches
Mail list logo