Duane,
Duane Ellis wrote:
> Before we say “violation” and run around as if our hair was on fire
> fire, we need to ask them where the source code is (Gently) and
> give them time to respond.
Please read the GPL more carefully. Freddie's mail makes it quite
clear to me that this is a violation of
On Friday 09 of October 2015 07:04:35 Duane Ellis wrote:
> Question: Have you made request on their web site? What was their response?
A few hours ago I've sent them a message via "Contact Us" form on their
website, so far nothing. If I get no answer I may try to post something on
their forum, b
>> It would have been decent to give hime some time to
>> respond.
>
> Did I do something wrong here?
>
You did the correct thing by keeping vigilant and looking for things. Thanks
for keeping your eye ball open.
I wish we had somebody to keep track of the Russian, China and Korea sites (as
On Friday 09 of October 2015 10:43:01 Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> Remi Prud'Homme is active on this list and probably working for System
> Workbench for STM32.
Only "probably".
> It would have been decent to give hime some time to
> respond.
Did I do something wrong here?
Regards,
FCh
> "Freddie" == Freddie Chopin writes:
Freddie> On Friday 09 of October 2015 09:34:00 Joerg Wunsch wrote:
>> They only have to hand you over the sources upon request, so the next
>> step for you would be to just file that request.
Remi Prud'Homme is active on this list and probabl
On 09/10/15 09:22, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Needless to say, that the installed tool doesn't have OpenOCD sources (or I
> didn't find any). The only good side is that they mention OpenOCD's GPL
> license in their EULA displayed during installation.
>
> Regards,
> FCh
>
Your last pa
On Friday 09 of October 2015 09:34:00 Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> They only have to hand you over the sources upon request, so
> the next step for you would be to just file that request.
I just did it (;
Regards,
FCh
--
__
As Freddie Chopin wrote:
> Needless to say, that the installed tool doesn't have OpenOCD sources (or I
> didn't find any).
That's not required by GPL, providing the sources by default
is just one way to meet the licensing conditions.
They only have to hand you over the sources upon request, so
Hello!
I have just found out about a possible GPL violation in the "System Workbench
for STM32" (also known as "AC6") -
http://www.st.com/web/en/catalog/tools/FM147/CL1794/SC961/SS1533/PF261797
or directly http://www.openstm32.org/System+Workbench+for+STM32
You need to login to download the in
