Hello.
Recently, when submitting a patch for a board file, the issue of a
gdb-attach event procedure (if I'm using the correct tcl term) came
up. Several board files have gdb-attach entries:
at91rm9200-dk.cfg:$_TARGETNAME configure -event gdb-attach { reset init }
at91rm9200-ek.cfg:$_TARGETNAME
Oh ok. I'm not in any rush, just saw a relatively high patch load
coming through and didn't want to get missed and dropped.
Chris
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Spencer reviewed it already and it looked good to him.
>
> Minimally we want to let patches s
Hello.
Is there something special I should be doing to get a patch reviewed?
I fixed an issue that I discussed in detail with Freddie last month
and pushed the patch to Gerrit but its been sitting on there for a few
days now with only a single person that reviewed it. Would hate to
have it get sta
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> W dniu 2012-02-03 15:59, Chris Morgan pisze:
>
>> Need me to do anything here Freddie? I modified my review on your
>> patch presuming that we would address the board issues in another way.
>
>
> I've posted
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Chris Morgan wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Freddie Chopin wrote:
>> W dniu 2012-02-02 22:11, Chris Morgan pisze:
>>
>>> How does it look in tcl to override the init_targets from the
>>> lpc2478.cpu file in code
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> W dniu 2012-02-02 22:11, Chris Morgan pisze:
>
>> How does it look in tcl to override the init_targets from the
>> lpc2478.cpu file in code?
>
>
> You just write another init_targets() and it overrides the previo
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> W dniu 2012-02-02 21:24, Chris Morgan pisze:
>
>> Is the idea to allow some kind of function chaining? I guess I'm not
>> understanding what the principle use of init_targets() was that makes
>> it better than si
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> W dniu 2012-02-02 20:54, Øyvind Harboe pisze:
>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Chris Morgan wrote:
>>> Hi Oyvind.
>>>
>>> Would you be able to provide some guidance on how to resolve the
>>> is
Hi Oyvind.
Would you be able to provide some guidance on how to resolve the
issues with the lpc2478.cpu and others that are setting TARGETNAME
from the init_target path and board files like the ea board file that
use TARGETNAME when sourced and before the init code is called?
Chris
On Feb 2, 20
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> W dniu 2012-02-02 18:09, Chris Morgan pisze:
>
>> Do you know who came up with the init_target idea? That's the person
>> that would probably best help decide what to do.
>
>
> Ųyvind? I don't remember,
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> W dniu 2012-02-02 01:25, Chris Morgan pisze:
>
>> Saw your patch. I tried the same thing here but it doesn't work for
>> the embedded artists target, the board I have here for testing
>> openocd.
>>
>&g
Hi.
Saw your patch. I tried the same thing here but it doesn't work for
the embedded artists target, the board I have here for testing
openocd.
The ea target includes the lpc2478.cpu file and then starts using
_TARGETNAME. As I mentioned in my original email, because init hasn't
been called yet t
On Feb 1, 2012, at 7:02 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> John Devereux wrote:
Of course any users board script will be broken too,
>>>
>>> Can you send a patch to gerrit with your board cfg? I'd be happy to
>>> add it.
>>
>> I don't think our config would be of a lot of general use.
>
> That's not a
Just signed up for this list as I'm a new openocd user and I saw this
email thread. Ubuntu 11.10 with openocd 0.5.0.
I think I'm seeing the same issue but it seems like a bit of a catch
22 case that I can't figure out.
My openocd.cfg is simple and uses only existing scripts:
# jlink is well s
14 matches
Mail list logo
