On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:30 AM, simonqian.openocd
wrote:
> Hi all,
> I read the mail list recently and find the libSWD commit.
> It's good that libSWD is ready to use.
>
> I have also pushed SWD support in OpenOCD, but it's still not supported.
> SWD support for Versaloon is implemented several ye
On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 04:07 -0800, Tomek CEDRO wrote:
> Hello Mahavir :-) My changes are not going to be accepted to OpenOCD
> anyway, so I have switched to different tasks. Speed can be increased
> a lot by using MPSSE driver, but thats the work for you if you want it
> working :-) Ask the develop
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Mahavir Jain wrote:
> This (loading speed) is big problem, because it affects whole debugging
> exercise with SWD. Have you tried attaching debugger to debug image,
> loaded into RAM of target device? I get frequent timeouts and issues
> with halt/resume. Any recom
Hi Tomek,
On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 04:19 -0800, Tomek CEDRO wrote:
[...]
> > 21708 bytes written at address 0x0010
> > 176 bytes written at address 0x2000
> > downloaded 21884 bytes in 87.741547s (0.244 KiB/s)
[...]
> From my testing debug level does not affect efficiency at all, because
>
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Tomek CEDRO wrote:
>> When the code is intergrated to OpenOCD master
> I don't think it will be..
As I said - there is no clear list on what needs to be done, Spen
changes first then we discuss over the code...
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www
Tomek CEDRO wrote:
> When the code is intergrated to OpenOCD master
I don't think it will be.. I understand that you feel like you wasted
a lot of time, but that's really your own fault for not working with
the community. *You* made the choice to spend a lot of time working
on your code, before yo
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Mahavir Jain wrote:
> Find it below:
> =
> Debug: 188 17 signal.c:42 oocd_interface_signal_find(): Interface signal
> - searching for 'RnW' signal...
> Debug: 189 17 signal.c:50 oocd_interface_signal_find(): Interface signal
> - not defined (yet?).
> Er
On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 04:19 -0800, Tomek CEDRO wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Mahavir Jain wrote:
> > That did the trick! I should have checked it earlier before shouting
> > here :( RnW interface_signal was missing in config file. I am not
> > entirely sure of its purpose though?
>
>
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Mahavir Jain wrote:
> That did the trick! I should have checked it earlier before shouting
> here :( RnW interface_signal was missing in config file. I am not
> entirely sure of its purpose though?
Hello Mahavir :-) I am happy to hear that thinks are working now!
Hi Tomek,
That did the trick! I should have checked it earlier before shouting
here :( RnW interface_signal was missing in config file. I am not
entirely sure of its purpose though?
Debug: 188 148 signal.c:42 oocd_interface_signal_find(): Interface
signal - searching for 'RnW' signal
Hello Mahavir :-)
Do you use latest source code? Please make sure that you clone a fresh
copy of the repository, as at the end of development some forced
commits took place.
Anyway this is perfect example that debug messages should be upgraded
in OpenOCD, what I have proposed and even presented i
Hi All,
I am using OpenOCD with SWD support, from LibSWD port (compiled one from
http://repo.or.cz/r/openocd/libswd.git git repo) and using KT-Link
hardware adapter for testing SWD interface on Cortex-M3 custom board but
finding below issue:
Log:
===
Open On-Chip Debugger 0.7.0-dev-ga21589d-dirty
12 matches
Mail list logo
