Re: [OpenOCD-devel] Fwd: Problem with GDB protocol

2015-02-10 Thread Paul Fertser
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 08:20:26AM +0100, Matej Kupljen wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 07:13:05AM +0100, Matej Kupljen wrote: > >> $ arm-linux-gdb -v > >> GNU gdb 6.8 > > > > Isn't this really ancient? > > Well, this is what I have to use, not my choice. But why? Isn't modern gdb working with

Re: [OpenOCD-devel] Fwd: Problem with GDB protocol

2015-02-10 Thread Matej Kupljen
Hello, > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 07:13:05AM +0100, Matej Kupljen wrote: >> $ arm-linux-gdb -v >> GNU gdb 6.8 > > Isn't this really ancient? Well, this is what I have to use, not my choice. >> While looking in the remote log file, i have seen that gdb responds with: >> w ++$?#3f > > I'd like to k

Re: [OpenOCD-devel] Fwd: Problem with GDB protocol

2015-02-10 Thread Paul Fertser
Hello, On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 07:13:05AM +0100, Matej Kupljen wrote: > $ arm-linux-gdb -v > GNU gdb 6.8 Isn't this really ancient? > While looking in the remote log file, i have seen that gdb responds with: > w ++$?#3f I'd like to know more about those pluses. The first plus is the acknowledgm

[OpenOCD-devel] Fwd: Problem with GDB protocol

2015-02-10 Thread Matej Kupljen
To all, I tried to used OpenOCD on my board with Atmel AT91SAM9263 with Amontec jtagkey and it works great, only I had to *slow* it down to 5 kHz while initialization. Even after PLL setup, I still have to use slower clock, around 4MHz. I couldn't make it to work with GDB. I was always getting t