On 04/10/12 18:39, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Spencer Oliver wrote:
Last patch to be merged from master to v0.6.1 is in gerrit:
http://openocd.zylin.com/#/c/897/
>>>
>>> Having a separate branch for 0.6.1 makes no sense.
>>>
>>> I think packaging 0.6.1 after the weekend is a fine idea, but just
W dniu 2012-10-04 18:54, Peter Stuge pisze:
> Having a separate branch for 0.6.1 makes no sense.
>
> I think packaging 0.6.1 after the weekend is a fine idea, but just
> grab whatever is on master. That is why we use gerrit, right?
There are patches in master that are not in category "bugfix" - li
Spencer Oliver wrote:
> > > Last patch to be merged from master to v0.6.1 is in gerrit:
> > > http://openocd.zylin.com/#/c/897/
> >
> > Having a separate branch for 0.6.1 makes no sense.
> >
> > I think packaging 0.6.1 after the weekend is a fine idea, but just
> > grab whatever is on master. That
On 4 Oct 2012 17:57, "Peter Stuge" wrote:
>
> Freddie Chopin wrote:
> > Last patch to be merged from master to v0.6.1 is in gerrit:
> > http://openocd.zylin.com/#/c/897/
>
> Having a separate branch for 0.6.1 makes no sense.
>
> I think packaging 0.6.1 after the weekend is a fine idea, but just
>
Freddie Chopin wrote:
> Last patch to be merged from master to v0.6.1 is in gerrit:
> http://openocd.zylin.com/#/c/897/
Having a separate branch for 0.6.1 makes no sense.
I think packaging 0.6.1 after the weekend is a fine idea, but just
grab whatever is on master. That is why we use gerrit, righ
Hi!
If noone objects I intend to do final v0.6.1 on this weekend, let's say
that on 07.10.2012.
Last patch to be merged from master to v0.6.1 is in gerrit:
http://openocd.zylin.com/#/c/897/
There will be no rc phase.
I'm wondering whether we should remove v0.6.0 and v0.6.0-rc2 sources
from so
