On 11/10/2021 12:32, Tommy Murphy wrote:
> Would anybody have a link to the aforementioned mailing list discussion
> pertaining to licensing issues relating to FTDI libraries? I tried
> searching the archives but couldn't find anything. Thanks.
I vaguely remember that, but don't have the emails -
tof mulier"
Cc: "openocd-devel"
Verzonden: Maandag 11 oktober 2021 10:47:25
Onderwerp: Re: Porting the P Multilink Universal adapter
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 9:52 AM wrote:
Did anyone contact P Micro directly, to ask them if they can change the
license on that dll?
If not
On 10/10/2021 22:24, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
Am 09.10.21 um 13:13 schrieb David Brown:
On 08/10/2021 13:10, Antonio Borneo wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 12:36 PM Christopher West
wrote:
That's a shame some vendors are so anti-users that they do not release
useful documentation and code
Hi David,
Am 11.10.21 um 11:49 schrieb David Brown:
> On 10/10/2021 22:24, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
>> Am 09.10.21 um 13:13 schrieb David Brown:
...
>> Here are my two cents. I'm open source developer. I do it, because I care
>> about my freedom. I prefer
>> to give my personal time to make great
and age. I'd expect at least Linux if not also Mac
software support these days.
From: Andreas Fritiofson
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2021 10:51:09 AM
To: Antonio Borneo
Cc: openocd-devel
Subject: Re: Porting the P Multilink Universal adapter
On Mon, Oct 11
On 11.10.21 11:49, David Brown wrote:
> The licencing for OpenOCD, and how strictly it is applied, is entirely
> up to the people who write the software. So your two cents are worth
> a great deal more than my two cents here.
>
> However, you should be aware that while this is clearly not a mere
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 11:02 AM Antonio Borneo
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 10:52 AM wrote:
> >
> > Hi Antonio,
> >
> > > I'm really skeptical they would agree to change the license.
> >
> > Why would they not agree? They sell hardware. If more people can use
> their hardware (eg. through
>
> - Oorspronkelijk bericht -
> Van: "Antonio Borneo"
> Aan: "kristof mulier"
> Cc: "openocd-devel"
> Verzonden: Maandag 11 oktober 2021 10:47:25
> Onderwerp: Re: Porting the P Multilink Universal adapter
>
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 9
o Borneo"
Aan: "kristof mulier"
Cc: "openocd-devel"
Verzonden: Maandag 11 oktober 2021 10:47:25
Onderwerp: Re: Porting the P Multilink Universal adapter
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 9:52 AM wrote:
>
> Did anyone contact P Micro directly, to ask them if the
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 9:52 AM wrote:
>
> Did anyone contact P Micro directly, to ask them if they can change the
> license on that dll?
>
> If not - I'm willing to give it a try ^_^
>
> Kind regards,
> Kristof Mulier
Hi Kristof,
thanks for your offer.
I'm really skeptical they would agree to
Did anyone contact P Micro directly, to ask them if they can change the
license on that dll?
If not - I'm willing to give it a try ^_^
Kind regards,
Kristof Mulier
Am 09.10.21 um 13:13 schrieb David Brown:
>
>
> On 08/10/2021 13:10, Antonio Borneo wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 12:36 PM Christopher West
>> wrote:
That's a shame some vendors are so anti-users that they do not release
useful documentation and code for their tools. Guess they
On 08/10/2021 13:10, Antonio Borneo wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 12:36 PM Christopher West
> wrote:
>>>
>>> That's a shame some vendors are so anti-users that they do not release
>>> useful documentation and code for their tools. Guess they should be
>>> boycotted especially given other
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 12:36 PM Christopher West
wrote:
>>
>> That's a shame some vendors are so anti-users that they do not release
>> useful documentation and code for their tools. Guess they should be
>> boycotted especially given other much more friendly tools and vendors
>> exist.
>
>
> It's
>
> That's a shame some vendors are so anti-users that they do not release
> useful documentation and code for their tools. Guess they should be
> boycotted especially given other much more friendly tools and vendors
> exist.
>
It's a shame but I'm stuck with this one as it was just in my price
Hello Christopher,
On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 03:52:56PM +0100, Christopher West wrote:
> No you would not. Unless you have permission to distribute the source code
> of
> the DLLs under GPL, you cannot distribute OpenOCD built to link with these
> DLLs. It doesn't matter how you divide up
> No you would not. Unless you have permission to distribute the source code
> of the DLLs under GPL, you cannot distribute OpenOCD built to link with
> these DLLs. It doesn't matter how you divide up the distribution in
> packages.
>
That's a shame it will just have to be for my own use then.
On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 12:58 PM wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-10-06 at 13:06 +0200, Michael Schwingen wrote:
> > On 06.10.21 12:15, cw...@thedigitaledge.co.uk wrote:
> > > All,
> > >
> > > I'm currently trying to port P Multilink Universal[1,2]. This is
> > > currently supported by pyocd-pemicro[3]
%20not%20require,privately%2C%20without%20ever%20releasing%20them.
From: cw...@thedigitaledge.co.uk
Sent: Thursday, October 7, 2021 11:28:41 AM
To: openocd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Porting the P Multilink Universal adapter
On Wed, 2021-10-06 at 13:06
On Wed, 2021-10-06 at 13:06 +0200, Michael Schwingen wrote:
> On 06.10.21 12:15, cw...@thedigitaledge.co.uk wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I'm currently trying to port P Multilink Universal[1,2]. This is
> > currently supported by pyocd-pemicro[3] using external dll[4].
>
> What license applies to
On 06.10.21 12:15, cw...@thedigitaledge.co.uk wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm currently trying to port P Multilink Universal[1,2]. This is
> currently supported by pyocd-pemicro[3] using external dll[4].
What license applies to these DLLs?
https://github.com/NXPmicro/pypemicro specifies "bsd 3-clause",
All,
I'm currently trying to port P Multilink Universal[1,2]. This is
currently supported by pyocd-pemicro[3] using external dll[4].
I have successfully create a c interface for for the dll and I'm now
trying to integrate this into the openocd code.
I have add it as a hla interface as the dll
22 matches
Mail list logo
