Re: [OpenOCD-devel] SWD with OpenOCD

2012-10-30 Thread CeDeROM
The interface_signal and interface_bitbang are now ported and ready for testing, both functions extend ft2232 interface in the source code and are available from TCL interface. I will use ft2232 because I have this tested and working, however I know that new mpsse driver is far better, I will write

Re: [OpenOCD-devel] SWD with OpenOCD

2012-10-30 Thread CeDeROM
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:35 PM, CeDeROM wrote: > I just realized that libswd is using the submodule framework and it > could be easier to re-commit again all my changes on top of a fresh > repository (openocd master) as some parts are also already fixed... So I did that way, I am using new Open

Re: [OpenOCD-devel] SWD with OpenOCD

2012-10-21 Thread CeDeROM
Great, thanks! :-) I just realized that libswd is using the submodule framework and it could be easier to re-commit again all my changes on top of a fresh repository (openocd master) as some parts are also already fixed... ill give it a try maybe its better than analyzing all changes since alst ye

Re: [OpenOCD-devel] SWD with OpenOCD

2012-10-21 Thread Evan Hunter
Hi Tom, I’m definitely willing to help, I found that most of the commits in the fork conflicted (mainly due to code reformatting), so I squashed all the commits, and then merging was fairly painless. I’ve also reformatted the files so that they pass checkpatch if you’re interested... (the Ope

Re: [OpenOCD-devel] SWD with OpenOCD

2012-10-20 Thread Bill Traynor
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Spencer Oliver wrote: > On 20 Oct 2012 14:01, "Peter Stuge" wrote: >> >> > but who is "we" >> >> I do not believe that ARM have published their CMSIS-DAP >> implementation, so we, the OpenOCD project, do not have it. >> > > As far as I know you can just create an

Re: [OpenOCD-devel] SWD with OpenOCD

2012-10-20 Thread Spencer Oliver
On 20 Oct 2012 14:01, "Peter Stuge" wrote: > > > but who is "we" > > I do not believe that ARM have published their CMSIS-DAP > implementation, so we, the OpenOCD project, do not have it. > As far as I know you can just create an account on arm silver and download the spec/code. > It's clear tha

Re: [OpenOCD-devel] SWD with OpenOCD

2012-10-20 Thread Uwe Bonnes
> "Peter" == Peter Stuge writes: Peter> Freddie Chopin wrote: >> > > There's also the blackmagic code, which is nice and small. >> > >> > And just to overdose on info, we also have the CMSIS-DAP >> implementation > from ARM themselves. >> >> OK - I've found what B

Re: [OpenOCD-devel] SWD with OpenOCD

2012-10-20 Thread Peter Stuge
Freddie Chopin wrote: > > > There's also the blackmagic code, which is nice and small. > > > > And just to overdose on info, we also have the CMSIS-DAP implementation > > from ARM themselves. > > OK - I've found what Black Magic Probe is, Well the probe is one thing, but the code can also be bui

Re: [OpenOCD-devel] SWD with OpenOCD

2012-10-20 Thread Freddie Chopin
W dniu 2012-10-20 10:57, Spencer Oliver pisze: > > There's also the blackmagic code, which is nice and small. > > > > > > And just to overdose on info, we also have the CMSIS-DAP implementation > from ARM themselves. OK - I've found what Black Magic Probe is, but who is "we" and is having this

Re: [OpenOCD-devel] SWD with OpenOCD

2012-10-20 Thread Spencer Oliver
On 20 Oct 2012 06:22, "Peter Stuge" wrote: > > CeDeROM wrote: > > Thank you for your interest in LibSWD :-) This is the solution to > > provide SWD over FT2232 > > There's also the blackmagic code, which is nice and small. > > And just to overdose on info, we also have the CMSIS-DAP implementatio

Re: [OpenOCD-devel] SWD with OpenOCD

2012-10-19 Thread Peter Stuge
CeDeROM wrote: > Thank you for your interest in LibSWD :-) This is the solution to > provide SWD over FT2232 There's also the blackmagic code, which is nice and small. //Peter -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.

Re: [OpenOCD-devel] SWD with OpenOCD

2012-10-19 Thread Spencer Oliver
On 19 October 2012 09:34, Tomek CEDRO wrote: > Yes I heard new driver supports async operations and this could greatly > improve speed for swd compared to the one tested on April this year... I am > back in the game hoping to finish the matter this time ;-) :-) > > On Oct 19, 2012 10:17 AM, "Fredd

Re: [OpenOCD-devel] SWD with OpenOCD

2012-10-19 Thread Tomek CEDRO
Yes I heard new driver supports async operations and this could greatly improve speed for swd compared to the one tested on April this year... I am back in the game hoping to finish the matter this time ;-) :-) On Oct 19, 2012 10:17 AM, "Freddie Chopin" wrote: > Oh - new version - I have to compi

Re: [OpenOCD-devel] SWD with OpenOCD

2012-10-19 Thread Freddie Chopin
Oh - new version - I have to compile and test too (; BTW - If you haven't already noticed, I'd like to interest you in the new FTDI driver, which will probably work much better and is easier to configure (no need to modify ft2232.c code to add/change something). 4\/3!!

Re: [OpenOCD-devel] SWD with OpenOCD

2012-10-19 Thread CeDeROM
Hello Evan :-) Thank you for your interest in LibSWD :-) This is the solution to provide SWD over FT2232 (and other devices as well), and it somewhat already works :-) I have got back into the work recently, it was delayed due to overwork and PhD, but I made it to release 0.4 on Sunday. Thanks to