Please add these .cfg as new interface configuration files.
Thanks.
Regards,
Laurent Gauch
http://www.amontec.com
JTAGkey / JTAGkey-Tiny / JTAGkey-HiSpeed maker
##
## Amontec JTAGkey
## http://www.amontec.com
##
## interface reference: http://www.amontec.com/jtagkey.shtml
## openocd location
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi out there!
During execution of flash commands, somehow this watchdog is not
triggered. The result are many of these lines:
BUG: keep_alive() was not invoked in the 1000ms timelimit. GDB alive
packet not sent!
How can I switch them off, as
Due to the fixes for 'make maintainer-clean' and handling release
versioning better, I've spun yet another 0.1.0 source distribution.
I've placed it at
http://www.kc8apf.net/files/openocd-0.1.0.tar.gz per usual.
'make distcheck' passes on OS X 10.5. Same request applies:
try to
Please add these files instead the previous ones.
The 'A' is still a trouble for ft2232 based emulators.
Amontec Team is working on ft2232.c and the jtagkey layout. Also, we
will resolve the specific ' A' on Windows in the same time.
After resolving the ' A', the specific 'Windows OS' lines
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 07:53:14AM -0600, lou.openocd...@fixit.nospammail.net
wrote:
And another part for rlink:
# Raisonance RLink
SYSFS{idVendor}==138e, SYSFS{idProduct}==9000, MODE=664, GROUP=plugdev
Does the 4 in 664 make sense?
Yes, you don't want _all_ users to have write access,
In my copy of the repo, at91sam9260.cfg is what at91sam9260minimal.cfg
was. In fact, the checkin shows that at91sam9260.cfg was replaced.
The fix in unknown-board-atmel-at91sam9260.cfg is still necessary.
Committed in r1353.
Rick
On Jan 19, 2009, at 11:52 PM, Dean Glazeski wrote:
It
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 04:39:52PM +0100, Uwe Hermann wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 07:53:14AM -0600, lou.openocd...@fixit.nospammail.net
wrote:
And another part for rlink:
# Raisonance RLink
SYSFS{idVendor}==138e, SYSFS{idProduct}==9000, MODE=664,
GROUP=plugdev
Does the 4 in
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 08:39:14PM +0100, Uwe Hermann wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 09:07:42AM -0800, Rick Altherr wrote:
I await an updated file that includes all the additional device lines
that have flown by on this list.
Sure, attached.
Oops, forgot one. Updated patch attached.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:15:42AM -0600, lou.openocd...@fixit.nospammail.net
wrote:
Of course. Why not 0, then? Does it make sense to give everybody read
access to the node?
Ah, I see. I don't know which one should be used, I don't mind either
way. As far as I've seen in /etc/udev/ on my
Rick Altherr a écrit :
In terms of including this as part of OpenOCD, we suffer from
supporting multiple platforms and distrubtions. The preferred install
location for the udev script is likely to vary by distribution and it
only applies to the Linux platform. Many other projects handle
On Jan 20, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Uwe Hermann wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 08:39:14PM +0100, Uwe Hermann wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 09:07:42AM -0800, Rick Altherr wrote:
I await an updated file that includes all the additional device
lines
that have flown by on this list.
Sure,
I just uploaded the source distribution of OpenOCD 0.1.0 to the
BerliOS project site (http://developer.berlios.de/projects/openocd/).
Thanks to everyone for their contributions and testing.
The final version of 0.1.0 differs only by a few minor fixes to the
autotools scripts and the
12 matches
Mail list logo
