On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com wrote:
After some consideration, I've changed my view to that the
release manager should have git access and that the master
branch developers *should* follow the release managers
marching orders and that we follow the
On 21/06/2011, at 3:59 PM, Laurent Gauch wrote:
On 21/06/2011, at 1:07 AM, Laurent Gauch wrote:
/ // / On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Steve Bennett steveb at
workware.net.au
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development wrote:
// // On 20/06/2011, at 8:54 PM, Øyvind
Try this:
http://repo.or.cz/w/jimtcl.git/commit/fbc998db178da5c462e164b63da128a7d7412e37
With your recent changes, now 'make distcheck' works for me.
Many thanks :-)
I am away on holiday at the moment so will not get time to look at this
again until next week.
Cheers
Spen
Steve Bennett wrote:
On 21/06/2011, at 3:59 PM, Laurent Gauch wrote:
On 21/06/2011, at 1:07 AM, Laurent Gauch wrote:
/ // / On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Steve Bennett steveb at workware.net.au
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development wrote:
//
On 21/06/2011, at 4:45 PM, Laurent Gauch wrote:
Steve Bennett wrote:
On 21/06/2011, at 3:59 PM, Laurent Gauch wrote:
On 21/06/2011, at 1:07 AM, Laurent Gauch wrote:
/ // / On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Steve Bennett steveb at
workware.net.au
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Laurent Gauch
laurent.ga...@amontec.com wrote:
Latest version, 1.0.4. Same behaviour on both MacOSX and Linux.
Sure. I'll ask if they would like to fix this problem.
I will let you know what useful response I get.
Great.
But are you sure to have the
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Xiaofan Chen xiaof...@gmail.com wrote:
But are you sure to have the correct libusb version. On linux and mac, the
libusb is the kernel driver for the d2xx.
This has been discussed before and I think in this case an exception should
be granted and the patch
On 21/06/2011, at 5:01 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Xiaofan Chen xiaof...@gmail.com wrote:
But are you sure to have the correct libusb version. On linux and mac, the
libusb is the kernel driver for the d2xx.
This has been discussed before and I think in this case
Xiaofan Chen wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Xiaofan Chen xiaof...@gmail.com wrote:
But are you sure to have the correct libusb version. On linux and mac, the
libusb is the kernel driver for the d2xx.
This has been discussed before and I think in this case an exception should
Steve Bennett wrote:
On 21/06/2011, at 5:01 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Xiaofan Chen xiaof...@gmail.com wrote:
But are you sure to have the correct libusb version. On linux and mac, the
libusb is the kernel driver for the d2xx.
This has been
On 21/06/2011, at 5:18 PM, Laurent Gauch wrote:
Steve Bennett wrote:
On 21/06/2011, at 5:01 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Xiaofan Chen xiaof...@gmail.com wrote:
But are you sure to have the correct libusb version. On linux and mac, the
libusb is the
Hi all,
yesterday I run into the ELF like this :
Program Headers:
Type Offset VirtAddr PhysAddr FileSiz MemSiz Flg Align
LOAD 0x74 0x8000 0x 0xe1f18 0xe1f18 RWE 0x1
LOAD 0x0e1f8c 0x0060f028 0x 0x1103f 0x1103f RWE 0x1
As it can be
Some more posts on this interesting topic :
http://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/project/u-boot/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdittracker_item_id=642
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-utils/2002-08/msg00324.html
Seems to me that solution proposed in the patch is OK, but I am still
wondering :
is
My objective is not to block feature.Never,never,never ... But we have
to avoid any trouble in generic ft2232 driver regarding specific layout.
That's all.
Your TCL bitbang will control the port of the FTDI from an higher level
than FT2232.c. OK but you TCL
http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-grub@gnu.org/msg00715.html
From 1999? Time flies, eh?
What do you think ?
Until we understand this better, I think we can wait with applying the
patch.
Look at gdb source code?
Perhaps bfd library?
--
Øyvind Harboe
Can Zylin Consulting help on your
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com wrote:
http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-grub@gnu.org/msg00715.html
From 1999? Time flies, eh?
For BDF time flies slowely ;)... Anyway, I gave this just as example
of implementation (as I underlined, btw.), but real reasons
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:34:16 +0200, Martin Schmölzer
martin.schmoel...@student.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
Hi,
my ULINK driver for OpenOCD is finally in a usable state. Attached is
a patch
set that adds this driver + the custom firmware for the ULINK
adapter.
Currently, this is only tested with an
Am 06/21/2011 07:19 PM, schrieb Drasko DRASKOVIC:
Perhaps bfd library?
Yes, that would be the right place, but I hoped to avoid further digging ;).
Here is something interesting, from the gdb's src/bfd/elf.c, line 963
(and it is related to one of the posts I mentioned previously) :
if
On Tuesday 21 June 2011 19:11:17 Christopher Harvey wrote:
Hi Martin,
I've got a ulink at home with an MCB board (I forgot the exact number),
so this is exciting news for me.
I've been wanting to lean the internals of OCD and Jtag for a while,
could anybody suggest some technical
19 matches
Mail list logo
