[Openocd-development] 3rd Call For Papers, 18th Annual Tcl/Tk Conference 2011

2011-08-05 Thread Andreas Kupries
[[ Get your papers in. The deadline for abstracts and proposals is three weeks away. ]] 18th Annual Tcl/Tk Conference (Tcl'2011) http://www.tcl.tk/community/tcl2011/ October 24 - 28, 2011 Comfort Suites Manassas Manassas, Virgina, USA Important Dates: Abstracts and proposals due

Re: [Openocd-development] Tags

2011-08-05 Thread Spencer Oliver
On 5 August 2011 11:07, Øyvind Harboe wrote: >> And why shouldn't they be? > > To me it's a matter of taste if rc candidate tags are annotated or not. > > I'm good with either choice. I was just curious as to whether it was > accidental > or intentional. > > Looks like it was accidental in that w

Re: [Openocd-development] Tags

2011-08-05 Thread Øyvind Harboe
> And why shouldn't they be? To me it's a matter of taste if rc candidate tags are annotated or not. I'm good with either choice. I was just curious as to whether it was accidental or intentional. Looks like it was accidental in that we really should be using the release procedure and when we do

Re: [Openocd-development] Tags

2011-08-05 Thread Spencer Oliver
On 5 August 2011 10:39, Andreas Fritiofson wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Spencer Oliver > wrote: >> >> Release tags are annotated, but not rc tags >> > > Oh, but they are, or am I completely oblivious of git tags (quite possible)? > $ git checkout v0.4.0-rc2~2 > $ git describe > v

Re: [Openocd-development] Tags

2011-08-05 Thread Andreas Fritiofson
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Spencer Oliver wrote: > > Release tags are annotated, but not rc tags > > Oh, but they are, or am I completely oblivious of git tags (quite possible)? $ git checkout v0.4.0-rc2~2 $ git describe v0.4.0-rc1-193-g747a607 http://repo.or.cz/w/openocd.git/tag/cd8ad2e96

Re: [Openocd-development] Tags

2011-08-05 Thread Øyvind Harboe
> Release tags are annotated, but not rc tags This sounds like a good policy to me. -- Øyvind Harboe - Can Zylin Consulting help on your project? US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 87 40 27 http://www.zylin.com/ ___ Openocd-development

Re: [Openocd-development] Tags

2011-08-05 Thread Spencer Oliver
On 5 August 2011 10:26, Spencer Oliver wrote: > On 5 August 2011 10:19, Andreas Fritiofson > wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Spencer Oliver >> wrote: >>> >>> On 5 August 2011 09:58, Andreas Fritiofson >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Øyvind Harboe

Re: [Openocd-development] Tags

2011-08-05 Thread Spencer Oliver
On 5 August 2011 10:19, Andreas Fritiofson wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Spencer Oliver > wrote: >> >> On 5 August 2011 09:58, Andreas Fritiofson >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Øyvind Harboe >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> When I run git describe now I get v0.4

Re: [Openocd-development] Tags

2011-08-05 Thread Andreas Fritiofson
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Spencer Oliver wrote: > On 5 August 2011 09:58, Andreas Fritiofson > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Øyvind Harboe > > wrote: > >> > >> When I run git describe now I get v0.4.0-973-g0d7a948 rather than > >> a v0.5.0-rc2-. > >> > >> Is that

Re: [Openocd-development] Tags

2011-08-05 Thread Spencer Oliver
On 5 August 2011 09:58, Andreas Fritiofson wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Øyvind Harboe > wrote: >> >> When I run git describe now I get v0.4.0-973-g0d7a948 rather than >> a v0.5.0-rc2-. >> >> Is that intentional? >> >> I think it's nice that we stick to v0.4.0- until v0.5.0

Re: [Openocd-development] Tags

2011-08-05 Thread Andreas Fritiofson
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > When I run git describe now I get v0.4.0-973-g0d7a948 rather than > a v0.5.0-rc2-. > > Is that intentional? > > I think it's nice that we stick to v0.4.0- until v0.5.0- goes out > of the door. > > I have no particular opinion, exce

Re: [Openocd-development] Last call before release

2011-08-05 Thread Spencer Oliver
On 5 August 2011 04:38, Rodrigo Rosa wrote: > I submitted these patches a couple weeks ago, i guess everybody was > too busy with the release... > Could they be added? > > Thanks! > Sorry should have replied to your original email - i have put them in my patch todo list. Cheers Spen

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH] arm11: disable broken optimization for setting current scan chain

2011-08-05 Thread Spencer Oliver
On 5 August 2011 09:00, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > --- >  src/target/arm11_dbgtap.c |   14 +- >  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/target/arm11_dbgtap.c b/src/target/arm11_dbgtap.c > index 5c671cc..c6c5a50 100644 > --- a/src/target/arm11_dbgtap.c > +++ b

Re: [Openocd-development] Tags

2011-08-05 Thread Spencer Oliver
On 5 August 2011 07:56, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > When I run git describe now I get v0.4.0-973-g0d7a948 rather than > a v0.5.0-rc2-. > > Is that intentional? > > I think it's nice that we stick to v0.4.0- until v0.5.0- goes out > of the door. > > I have no particular opinion, except it sh

[Openocd-development] [PATCH] arm11: disable broken optimization for setting current scan chain

2011-08-05 Thread Øyvind Harboe
--- src/target/arm11_dbgtap.c | 14 +- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/target/arm11_dbgtap.c b/src/target/arm11_dbgtap.c index 5c671cc..c6c5a50 100644 --- a/src/target/arm11_dbgtap.c +++ b/src/target/arm11_dbgtap.c @@ -199,11 +199,15 @@ int arm11_ad