Re: [Openocd-development] git gui

2011-10-27 Thread Pete Batard
Apologies to anyone for annoying this list again with what are mostly discussions about the libusb dysfunctionality. If you aren't interested in finding why projects become dysfunctional, and why people will take palliative action then, please ignore. On 2011.10.27 00:53, Peter Stuge wrote: I

Re: [Openocd-development] git gui

2011-10-26 Thread Pete Batard
On 2011.10.26 16:29, Peter Stuge wrote: Øyvind Harboe wrote: my main problem has been that that I've found that those that use Tortoise have no patience for the complexities and necessity of interactive rebase, rather than Tortoise lack of support for this feature. This might fit Pete. In anot

Re: [Openocd-development] git gui

2011-10-26 Thread Pete Batard
On 2011.10.26 06:07, Øyvind Harboe wrote: On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Peter Stuge wrote: jim norris wrote: For those using a git gui, what are you using? On which system? For Windows, there is Git Extensions and TortoiseGit. The Git Extensions looked less slick than TortoiseGit last ti

Re: [Openocd-development] Peter Stuge is now an OpenOCD maintainer

2011-06-10 Thread Pete Batard
On 2011.06.10 16:12, Peter Stuge wrote: Pete Batard wrote: Peter's involvement as a maintainer has mostly been limited to rebuilding his personal (i.e. non official) git branch every 3 months or so. If this is really how things look that is bad. It is. Heck, I only have to quote y

Re: [Openocd-development] Peter Stuge is now an OpenOCD maintainer

2011-06-10 Thread Pete Batard
On 2011.06.10 14:03, Øyvind Harboe wrote: Peter won't be alone on this project. He will be one of the maintainers, perhaps that will work better for everybody? If I may (and then I'll shut up as, unless Peter has anything to say, I think I've taken enough of your time here), I don't foresee Op

Re: [Openocd-development] Peter Stuge is now an OpenOCD maintainer

2011-06-10 Thread Pete Batard
On 2011.06.10 13:24, Øyvind Harboe wrote: Well, Peter has certainly refused to step down, despite everybody else on the list pretty much voicing their support to the idea that this is the right thing for him to do, if he doesn't have the time/doesn't want to be involved. Ah. This is the tricky

Re: [Openocd-development] Peter Stuge is now an OpenOCD maintainer

2011-06-10 Thread Pete Batard
Hi Øyvind. I very much appreciate the constructive advice for help. On 2011.06.10 12:21, Øyvind Harboe wrote: Seems like a good opportunity for someone in the community to step up to the plate and take over the project if they want to. Well, the only problem we have here is that Daniel Drake,

Re: [Openocd-development] Peter Stuge is now an OpenOCD maintainer

2011-06-10 Thread Pete Batard
On 2011.06.10 07:10, Xiaofan Chen wrote: The community is very fortunate that he is *able* Wow, that is great to know. Peter will be able to understand what I mean... Yes. I'm happy for Peter here, and while I apologize for the intrusion as well as the opinion I am about to provide on matt