Update TODO list to relect 0.2.0 release.
---
TODO | 71 ---
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
Update TODO list to relect 0.2.0 release.
---
TODO | 71
Add missing copyright header and fix @page direction in membuf.h.
---
membuf.h | 24 +---
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Add missing copyright header and fix @page direction in membuf.h.
---
membuf.h | 24 +---
1 file changed, 21
Add missing copyright header to target_type.h.
---
target_type.h | 25 +
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
Add missing copyright header to target_type.h.
---
target_type.h | 25 +
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
==
only in patch2:
Minor fixes to Developer Manual pages.
- Fix cosmetic bug on main page
- Add missing JTAG list item.
---
main.txt |3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Minor fixes to Developer Manual pages.
- Fix cosmetic bug on main page
- Add missing JTAG list item.
---
main.txt |3
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 14:41 -0700, Joseph Kuss wrote:
Øyvind,
Is this a .exe file that will run from windows, like the 0.1.0 I
have ??
Is this 0.2.0 ?
Where Can I download this ?
Looking at your log files, you appear to be using the FTD2XX driver.
For that driver, your single option will
This series provides a number of minor fixes that need to be done
to improve the quality of the pending 0.2.0 package release.
1/11Improve BUGS file working and layout.
2/11Make bug reporting output at program start-ups use fewer new lines:
3/11Fix logger.pl script to avoid spurious
Make bug reporting output at program start-ups use fewer new lines:
- Move repository URL output associate it with the version; they relate.
- 'openocd --version' output now appears much more terse, as expected.
---
openocd.c |5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Make bug
Fix logger.pl script to avoid spurious empty line in some cases.
---
logger.pl |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Fix logger.pl script to avoid spurious empty line in some cases.
---
logger.pl |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
==
only in patch2:
Provide some useful information in README file, rather than punting.
---
README | 24 +++-
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Provide some useful information in README file, rather than punting.
---
README | 24 +++-
1 file changed, 23
Improve standard INSTALL document with OpenOCD-specific introduction:
- The standard INSTALL instructions allow building the documentation.
- Refer users to The User's Guide with better step-wise instructions.
---
INSTALL | 14 ++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
Improve standard
Add installation instructions provided by FSF, rather than punting.
---
INSTALL | 292 +++-
1 file changed, 291 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Add installation instructions provided by FSF, rather than punting.
---
INSTALL | 292
Fix doxygen warnings in new at91sam3 source file; normalize style.
Remove editor configuration from end of file.
---
at91sam3.c | 83 +++--
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
Fix doxygen warnings in new at91sam3 source file;
Fix @file documentation blocks in new interfaces source files.
---
interfaces.c | 10 +-
interfaces.h |4 ++--
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Fix @file documentation blocks in new interfaces source files.
---
interfaces.c | 10 +-
interfaces.h |4
Fix search and replace casualty in flash.h doxygen block.
---
flash.h |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Fix search and replace casualty in flash.h doxygen block.
---
flash.h |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
==
only in patch2:
unchanged:
---
Fix doxygen warning in jtag.h caused by a changed parameter name.
---
jtag.h |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Fix doxygen warning in jtag.h caused by a changed parameter name.
---
jtag.h |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
==
only in patch2:
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 15:40 -0700, Joseph Kuss wrote:
Øyvind
This is where I need a tutorial, I have not built my own openOCD , all
that I have
built is my target program using windows versions of GCC for ARM.
.
What tools do I need to do this ? Could you just build me a
windows .exe
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 16:06 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Monday 29 June 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
+
+This file contains a set of generic instructions, provided by default
+for all GNU automake packages. These instructions should be sufficient
+for you to configure the package to a point
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 17:11 -0700, Joseph Kuss wrote:
[snip]
FTDI is a chip company correct ?, I believe, openOCD consortium or
whatever it is
you guys call yourself have reasons why they must keep to the GPL
terms, Which you
could explain to me if you want, but for end users like me, I
The J-Link driver is GPL, and it has no licensing problems. If you can
use that, you may have some success; however, the 0.2.0 release will
contain a lot of fixes to this driver, which improve functionality and
compatibility among more versions of the dongles. If you use that
dongle, the a 0.2.0
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 18:07 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Sunday 28 June 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
To finish this task, the following more invasive changes are needed:
Getting rid of the array-of-drivers thing would be good too. :)
For things statically linked into the server, a linked
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 18:32 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Monday 29 June 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
+That OpenOCD Users's Guide contains information about OpenOCD-specific
+configuration options that are available.
I'd rather not see the User's guide get further clutter like
On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 12:50 +0200, Freddie Chopin wrote:
Dominic pisze:
It isn't possible with the current ft2232.c code because it uses
conditional compilation to compile either with libftdi or FTD2XX. While
offering basically the same functionality there are not only syntactical
but
Hey all,
I just committed the following patch to assist future development of the
JTAG interface driver modules, encapsulating this into its own source
file separate from everything else. This simply moves lines of codes
and adds some documentation, and the new files will allow developing a
On Sat, 2009-06-27 at 20:50 +0200, Freddie Chopin wrote:
Second version of previous patch improved with suggestions from Ronald.
Pls try (; Works for me :
This patch now looks 1000 times better with the changes from Ronald.
Thanks to both of you for producing and refining it.
My only
On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 01:23 +, Martin Panter wrote:
On 27/06/2009, Freddie Chopin freddie_cho...@op.pl wrote:
1. (this one) enable dynamic loading of ftd2xx.dll in ft2232.c
2. enable dynamic loading of libusb0.dll in ft2232.c
So why loading libusb rather than libftdi? Is it because
engineering; I can fix the performance.
Windows fixes must be obtained elsewhere, as I don't use that; however,
any engineer with similar experience and confidence could do both tasks.
Cheers,
Zach Welch
Corvallis, OR
** If the FSF is responsive to other inquiries, but fails to respond to
my inquiry about
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 11:15 -0400, Duane Ellis wrote:
Zach Welch wrote:
Only libusb+libftdi serves our long-term interests.
Wrong.
libusb is a *blocking* issue that we cannot control, fix, nor
whatever. LIBUSB is not supported by *newer* windows platforms. Unless
and until
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 16:32 +0200, Pavel Chromy wrote:
[snip]
No offense but isn't this sort of GPL madness?
Yes. This is completely insane: that you would continue to ask me for
advice that should be best answered by legal counsel. I am not a lawyer
and cannot give you the advice that you
Hi all,
While reviewing some of the recent documentation improvements, I started
thinking about daisy chaining two (or more) of my targets together into
a single scan chain, allowing me to write a script that flashes each
unit in turn.
In theory, I think this could just work today, assuming that
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 17:04 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Friday 26 June 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
Any tips for handling N RTCK signals, other
than my brute force use part(s) of a 7400 series IC or plain simply
don't approaches?
I found some info in a TI presentation when I
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 23:48 +0100, Wookey wrote:
+++ Zach Welch [2009-06-24 14:00 -0700]:
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 09:30 -0700, Zach Welch wrote:
I hereby commit myself to donating all profits recovered in the pursuit
of OpenOCD GPL violations on my behalf to a non-profit. I would prefer
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 01:17 -0700, Rob Barris wrote:
On Jun 24, 2009, at 1:32 PM, openocd-development-requ...@lists.berlios.de
wrote:
4) libftdi-ftd2xx: ABI compatible with libftdi, wraps ftd2xx
How would ftd2xx be linked here? Via LoadLibrary (dlopen) and
friends?
I'd
Hi all,
Michael Fischer posted the following survey on the SparkFun forum:
http://forum.sparkfun.com/viewtopic.php?t=16044
Please _everyone_ register (sorry) and tell us what host OS you want to
use OpenOCD with. It's not scientific or accurate, but comments could
help fill in information
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 11:12 +0200, freddie_cho...@op.pl wrote:
Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net napisał(a):
Hi all,
Michael Fischer posted the following survey on the SparkFun forum:
http://forum.sparkfun.com/viewtopic.php?t=16044
There are already some more votes here
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 01:09 -0700, Rob Barris wrote:
On Jun 23, 2009, at 7:53 PM, Rick Altherr wrote:
Technically, nothing is required from the project-side. The
infringement happens solely at the time of distribution, not at the
time of authoring or compilation. Since OpenOCD is only
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 14:55 +0200, Michael Bruck wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 17:34, Zach Welchz...@superlucidity.net wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 16:00 +0200, Michael Bruck wrote:
The libusb improvements certainly sound interesting, however no one
has stepped forward to implement them
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 19:19 +0200, Michael Schwingen wrote:
Zach Welch wrote:
Hi all,
Michael Fischer posted the following survey on the SparkFun forum:
http://forum.sparkfun.com/viewtopic.php?t=16044
Please _everyone_ register (sorry) and tell us what host OS you want to
use
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 00:21 +0159, Maciej Grela wrote:
Hi,
A friend of mine pointed me to the threads concerning
GPL/windows/building/libftdi/libusb/libd2xx. After reading all this an
idea came to my head - what if we implement our own GPL/LGPL version
of libd2xx.dll ?
[snip]
My concern
here. It doesn't appear to require a login to work:
http://www.freepollhosting.com/directory.php?id=437page=6pop=
The site seems still beta, but it should be able to house the poll at
the very least.
// Dean
On 06/25/2009 05:32 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 19:19 +0200
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 09:46 +0200, Nico Coesel wrote:
-Original Message-
From: openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:openocd-
development-boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Zach Welch
Sent: woensdag 24 juni 2009 1:10
To: Rick Altherr
Cc: openocd-development
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 19:53 -0700, Rick Altherr wrote:
Not only do I have a lack of time to work on OpenOCD, but I've been
dismayed by the arguments of late. I originally joined the project
because my Luminary eval kit wasn't working properly with OpenOCD.
Since then I've tried to help
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 10:52 +0200, Nico Coesel wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Zach Welch [mailto:z...@superlucidity.net]
Sent: woensdag 24 juni 2009 10:27
To: Nico Coesel
Cc: openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
Subject: Re: [Openocd-development] License
On Wed, 2009-06
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 11:18 +0200, Magnus Lundin wrote:
Simple project for a CS student.
A wrapper with a libftdi interface calling libftd2xx, as a project using
a LGPL license
So any user can take their binary copy of OpenOCD linked against libftdi
and simply replace the libftdi dll
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 11:46 +0200, Michael Bruck wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:30, Øyvind Harboeoyvind.har...@zylin.com wrote:
But why should we go for such an inferior and specif solution when a more
general one is proposed and worked on?
What are the speed/roundtrip time implications
then, please feel free to hate me for sticking to my ideals and
believing in the wisdom of foresight on these matters. I can take it.
Otherwise, I am looking forward to seeing the community move past these
issues and onto more constructive development matters.
Cheers,
Zach Welch
Corvallis
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 12:23 +0200, Michael Bruck wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:42, Zach Welchz...@superlucidity.net wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 11:18 +0200, Magnus Lundin wrote:
Simple project for a CS student.
A wrapper with a libftdi interface calling libftd2xx, as a project using
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 12:20 +0200, Dominic Rath wrote:
This goes inentionally to you alone, feel free to bring it up on the list if
you want...
You have made me start to wonder if it would be possible to bring some
sort of claim of misrepresentation against the project authors, were
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 14:08 +0200, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Hi Dominic,
first of all: there is every evidence that the technical problems
that USB are encountering these days will be resolved *LONG*
before any change in license could be effecuated.
I even believe that USB problems will be
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 09:09 -0400, Duane Ellis wrote:
Zach Welch wrote:
Fixed. There were a few could be used uninitialized warnings too.
These seem like they should have been covered by --enable-werror.
Duane, are you building with that option before committing changes?
I
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 09:13 -0400, Duane Ellis wrote:
David Brownell wrote:
I get all kinds of build errors on Ubuntu 9.04/x86_32 where the
chip details banks get initialized. The errors made no sense to
me, and they went away when I changed the
.bank[0] = { ... },
.bank[1] =
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 09:56 -0400, Duane Ellis wrote:
David Brownell wrote:
I get all kinds of build errors on Ubuntu 9.04/x86_32 where the
[snip]
.bank[0] = { ... },
duane i thought the bank[0] = { } was valid C99 initialization.
zach I just realized that I left out
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 07:28 -0700, Zach Welch wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 09:56 -0400, Duane Ellis wrote:
David Brownell wrote:
I get all kinds of build errors on Ubuntu 9.04/x86_32 where the
[snip]
.bank[0] = { ... },
duane i thought the bank[0] = { } was valid C99
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 16:00 +0200, Michael Bruck wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 13:29, Zach Welchz...@superlucidity.net wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 12:23 +0200, Michael Bruck wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:42, Zach Welchz...@superlucidity.net wrote:
[snip]
There is no infringement here,
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 08:34 -0700, Zach Welch wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 16:00 +0200, Michael Bruck wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 13:29, Zach Welchz...@superlucidity.net wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 12:23 +0200, Michael Bruck wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:42, Zach Welchz
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 17:53 +0100, John Devereux wrote:
Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net writes:
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 11:18 +0200, Magnus Lundin wrote:
Simple project for a CS student.
A wrapper with a libftdi interface calling libftd2xx, as a project using
a LGPL license
So
under the GPL license. We will find solutions for users that solve
these problems that comply with its terms.
Cheers,
Zach Welch
Corvallis, OR
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman
. Too many of mine die
a similar death, and it could be something to share a laugh over... in a
year or two. ;)
On Wednesday 24 June 2009 18:30:09 Zach Welch wrote:
Hi all,
Here is the full list of GPL-compliant solutions for libftd2xx GPL
compliance, after further review, consideration
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 20:14 +0100, Ian Guffick wrote:
snip
Here is the full list of GPL-compliant solutions for libftd2xx GPL
compliance, after further review, consideration, and enumeration:
1) Documentation: build it yourself!
2) Build-Kit: automate the build on users' machines
3)
. ;)
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 19:35 +0200, Dominic wrote:
On Wednesday 24 June 2009 19:04:37 Zach Welch wrote:
Are you any of those things, today? Is he contributing, today?
Please respect MR. Dominic Rath. He is the CREATOR of OpenOCD 2004
(with
1-2 years or more of intensive coding
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 09:30 -0700, Zach Welch wrote:
[snip]
To reiterate, I am now no longer willing to accept offers to do the work
that I actually need to survive, to demonstrate that my motives here
have no profit in them anymore. All previous offers for me to do paid
work are now off
Hello,
It remains somewhat unclear to me exactly how badly distributors need to
see a solution today, when users (who are all developers, right?) should
be able to compile the code themselves and use the FTD2XX driver.
If Windows is the blocker, the first question that should be answered
is:
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 21:36 +0200, Ronald Vanschoren wrote:
Note: Linux kernel modules need to be GPL, too - the only way to have
non-GPL drivers in Linux is to have userspace drivers, which are quite
limited in capabilities.
This is not correct. GPL v2 talks about derived work.
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 00:12 +0200, Ronald Vanschoren wrote:
This is _very_ apt observation, and one I almost forgot myself.
Thanks ;-)
As (I think) you say here, the Linux kernel module scenario does not
affect the legality of a loadable module in the same user-space process
as
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 09:32 +0200, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
An option that should be on there would be for FTDI to change
their license?
Yes! I put that in my reply to Harald, but I did forget to include it
in my summary. I just figured that I would list things that we as a
community could
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 11:49 +0200, Laurent Gauch wrote:
/ Øyvind mentioned the idea of wrapping the JTAG API in TCP/IP. Aside
// from performance implications I think this would require some
// significant development efforts with little immediate benefits. Even
// worse, it would
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 20:37 +0200, Michael Fischer wrote:
Hello List,
as I understand it correct, everything can be used, even close
software, if they do not use the same program space like
the GPL application. Now I have understand while we can not
use the wraper DLL!
Correct.
Second
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 20:20 +0200, Freddie Chopin wrote:
[snip]
Why do you consider it OK to ignore a license just because it
inconveniences you? Do you hold the same view regarding things you create?
Why do you consider it OK to overinterpret the license just because it
inconveniences
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 20:19 +0100, Ian Guffick wrote:
Hello to all,
I don't want to get involved in the 'war' that seems to have erupted over
this issue.
I am a user of OpenOCD rather than a developer, I regularly grab SVN head
and compile it under Cygwin for Windows with FTD2XX.lib. And
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 12:59 -0700, Rick Altherr wrote:
On Jun 23, 2009, at 11:49 AM, Zach Welch wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 20:20 +0200, Freddie Chopin wrote:
[snip]
Why do you consider it OK to ignore a license just because it
inconveniences you? Do you hold the same view regarding
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 21:53 +0100, John Devereux wrote:
Anders Montonen anders.monto...@iki.fi writes:
On Jun 23, 2009, at 21:20, Freddie Chopin wrote:
Anders Montonen pisze:
Right, but section four says You may not copy, modify, sublicense,
*or*
distribute the Program (emphasis
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 22:16 +0200, Dominic wrote:
Dear List,
1) I wont support any action against someone who distributes OpenOCD
binaries
linked against FTD2XX as long as there's no viable alternative. When I
wrote
the OpenOCD the liberties of potential users were paramount, and
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 22:21 +0200, Nico Coesel wrote:
[snip]
And here is the exact reason why the JTAG vendors are not going to put
effort into OpenOCD. A marriage works both ways!
The wife wants to cheat on me. What, I'm suppose to just be a cuckold?
I know I promised to contribute some
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 23:37 +0200, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
You will need to get confirmation from other contributors, as I think
the actual revision might be far lower than anyone realizes presently.
I started my contributions at svn 214 (or earlier, not easy to see
from a cursory look at the
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 21:57 +0100, Spencer Oliver wrote:
[snip]
GPL is important, but i do not understand people's objections to adding an
exception -
who exactly is this hurting?
Would you like to kick me in the nuts, while saying things like this?
The effect would feel little different.
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 00:00 +0200, Nico Coesel wrote:
Dear readers,
Just a remark about a tcp/ip socket server to get some discussion
going in that direction. Isn't there some sort of library available
that does all the hard work? Something like SOAP/DCOM/Corba without
the typical
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 23:52 +0200, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Zach Welchz...@superlucidity.net wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 23:37 +0200, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
You will need to get confirmation from other contributors, as I think
the actual revision might be far
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 22:02 +, Photo Leecher wrote:
Isn't it great that you are against a solution that would put a dent
in sales of your overpriced rip off 700€ hardware?
Gotta love the impartiality here...
Screw impartiality. If this should be a meritocracy, then Øyvind has
contributed
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 22:10 +, Photo Leecher wrote:
Guess what, OpenOCD wasn't started so YOU can get paid.
I do not expect any work to come my way from this.
If you don't like the way OpenOCD is managed, get out.
Ditto. Oh, wait... who has been helping manage things here?
Go away.
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 15:45 -0700, Rick Altherr wrote:
On Jun 23, 2009, at 3:05 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 21:57 +0100, Spencer Oliver wrote:
[snip]
GPL is important, but i do not understand people's objections to
adding an
exception -
who exactly
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 00:44 +0200, Michael Schwingen wrote:
Photo Leecher wrote:
Isn't it great that you are against a solution that would put a dent
in sales of your overpriced rip off 700€ hardware?
Gotta love the impartiality here...
The exception could be allowed now and then removed
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 17:07 -0700, Rick Altherr wrote:
But since you bring it up, sunk costs actually more relate to costs of
abandoning work that should have been profitable, because conditions
change that prevent the profit from being realized (or bigger profits
becoming available
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 18:39 -0700, Rick Altherr wrote:
On Jun 23, 2009, at 5:53 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 17:07 -0700, Rick Altherr wrote:
But since you bring it up, sunk costs actually more relate to
costs of
abandoning work that should have been profitable
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 19:59 +0200, Dominic wrote:
Hi List,
there has been some speculation about my original intents so I thought
I might chime in here.
I'm all in favor of enforcing the GPL where it achieves anything for
the user. In case of FTD2XX I decided to go the pragmatic
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 01:36 +0300, Yusuf Caglar AKYUZ wrote:
Zach Welch wrote:
Hi all,
I will try to summarize the OpenOCD license situation for the community:
- OpenOCD is licensed under the GPL -- without exceptions.
- Binaries linking to FTD2XX may NOT be distributed
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 14:45 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
Move the short chapter about JIM-Tcl earlier, so that we
can reasonably assume it's been introduced before we start
presenting things that presume such an introduction.
Plus a few minor typo-level fixes.
---
doc/openocd.texi | 88
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 01:50 +0300, Yusuf Caglar AKYUZ wrote:
Zach Welch wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 01:36 +0300, Yusuf Caglar AKYUZ wrote:
Zach Welch wrote:
Hi all,
I will try to summarize the OpenOCD license situation for the community:
- OpenOCD is licensed under the GPL
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 02:31 +0300, Yusuf Caglar AKYUZ wrote:
Zach Welch wrote:
Actually, I see no reason that it cannot be GPL too. It's only a
build tool; it will not be linking to either OpenOCD or FTD2XX, right?
The full GPL would prevent others from creating proprietary versions
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 21:52 -0700, Zach Welch wrote:
The following chain of patch series performs tree-wide whitespace
clean-up, using systematic search and replacement (i.e. sed).
It must be applied on top of the last series that changes the types.
The patches in these series have been
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 21:24 -0400, Duane Ellis wrote:
Zach Welch wrote:
There have been no objections to these series of patches, so I intend to
regenerate and apply them soon.
There is one thing I do not like - not exactly what you are talking
about here.. I'd rather my voice
Harald,
Thank you for taking the time to participate in this discussion.
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 12:53 +0200, Harald Kipp wrote:
Zach Welch wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 18:26 +0200, Harald Kipp wrote:
Dynamic linking to proprietary libraries by adding LoadLibrary and
GetProcAddress
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 11:28 +0200, Freddie Chopin wrote:
As no satisfying solution has been decided I will try to summarise the
options I think are fine for Windows users. Please - put away your
linux windows attitude aside for a moment and do keep in mind three
things before proceeding:
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 13:20 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Sunday 21 June 2009, Audrius Urmanavičius wrote:
I can also second Xiaofan, who offers distribution of .zip file with
Cygwin building environment set up, probably with shell script that
does `./bootstrap`, `./configure
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 22:05 +0100, John Devereux wrote:
Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net writes:
Harald,
Thank you for taking the time to participate in this discussion.
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 12:53 +0200, Harald Kipp wrote:
Zach Welch wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 18:26 +0200
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 23:15 +0200, Freddie Chopin wrote:
Zach Welch pisze:
Fix the problems with libusb and libfdti. Period.
This is starting to get ridiculous... As I already wrote somewhere - I
really would like to, but... I cannot. I'm not a PC programmer, in fact
I'm a newbie
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 17:38 -0400, Duane Ellis wrote:
zach Please DO NOT try to cheat the GPL license. You do not understand how
zach far I am willing to take these matters, and I believe any form of
binary
zach distribution to be a violation: a DLL wrapper, a binary patch,
anything!
Let
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 18:33 -0400, Duane Ellis wrote:
zach I am afraid that your intent will not matter even one iota, in a
court of law.
This is not, and was not ever my intent, I am speaking of what I see as
the original authors GPL+[undocumented]-exception intention.
zach If you want
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 14:24 +0200, Michael Schwingen wrote:
Michael Fischer wrote:
The instruction can be found here, and use libftdi and libftd2xx:
http://forum.sparkfun.com/viewtopic.php?t=11221
But the problem is that the normal user want to have a working solution
and do not / can
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 20:05 +0200, Michael Schwingen wrote:
Zach Welch wrote:
BTW: one possible solution for 64-bit windows would be to ship an
openocd appliance - ie. a VM image containing a minimal linux system
together with openocd libraries.
Users would need to install VMware
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 23:35 -0400, Duane Ellis wrote:
Commits - r2296 - through 2347 - are commits that fix printf()
-Werrors so that Cygwin will build.
These where done (for the most part) as one file per commit so that if a
specific issue arises, it can be reverted.
This is a *nasty*
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 07:08 +0300, Oleksandr Tymoshenko wrote:
Resume command works only if resume address is provided. Attached patch
fixes this problem
Thanks for catching this; sorry for breaking it during my cleanup.
Committed, r2348.
--Z
___
401 - 500 of 873 matches
Mail list logo
