Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH]es, closing out open commitments

2009-05-06 Thread Magnus Lundin
Added (BUILD_JLINK==1) condition to us new tables with JLink Regards Magnus ___ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH]es, closing out open commitments

2009-05-06 Thread Michael Schwingen
Magnus Lundin wrote: Added (BUILD_JLINK==1) condition to us new tables with JLink I usually build with both FT2232 and parport enabled (and use both) - how is that supposed to work with the patch? If I understood the patch correct, this can only work if both drivers are converted and

[Openocd-development] [PATCH]es, closing out open commitments

2009-05-05 Thread Dick Hollenbeck
* xsvf.patch: This simplifies XSTATE handling, and protects against illegal state transitions that might be in an SVF file. Previous code was vulnerable to a bad path. They are now handled through a robust use of the tms_seq[] table. With this patch and my xsvf_tools, I was able to work

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH]es, closing out open commitments

2009-05-05 Thread Øyvind Harboe
Hi Dick, I'm sorry to hear that things turned out the way they did. I believe that OpenOCD will be worse off without your efforts and you have for sure left some big marks on OpenOCD in terms of quantity and quality. BTW, I'm struggling with applying the patches, I don't know why... could you