Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH 2/3] ft2232: Failure to get latency should not be fatal

2011-06-23 Thread Laurent Gauch
Steve Bennett wrote: On 21/06/2011, at 5:22 PM, Steve Bennett wrote: On 21/06/2011, at 5:18 PM, Laurent Gauch wrote: Steve Bennett wrote: On 21/06/2011, at 5:01 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Xiaofan Chen xiaof...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH 2/3] ft2232: Failure to get latency should not be fatal

2011-06-22 Thread Steve Bennett
On 21/06/2011, at 5:22 PM, Steve Bennett wrote: On 21/06/2011, at 5:18 PM, Laurent Gauch wrote: Steve Bennett wrote: On 21/06/2011, at 5:01 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Xiaofan Chen xiaof...@gmail.com wrote: But are you sure to have the correct libusb

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH 2/3] ft2232: Failure to get latency should not be fatal / OBJECTION

2011-06-21 Thread Steve Bennett
On 21/06/2011, at 3:59 PM, Laurent Gauch wrote: On 21/06/2011, at 1:07 AM, Laurent Gauch wrote: / // / On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Steve Bennett steveb at workware.net.au https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development wrote: // // On 20/06/2011, at 8:54 PM, Øyvind

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH 2/3] ft2232: Failure to get latency should not be fatal / OBJECTION

2011-06-21 Thread Laurent Gauch
Steve Bennett wrote: On 21/06/2011, at 3:59 PM, Laurent Gauch wrote: On 21/06/2011, at 1:07 AM, Laurent Gauch wrote: / // / On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Steve Bennett steveb at workware.net.au https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development wrote: //

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH 2/3] ft2232: Failure to get latency should not be fatal / OBJECTION

2011-06-21 Thread Steve Bennett
On 21/06/2011, at 4:45 PM, Laurent Gauch wrote: Steve Bennett wrote: On 21/06/2011, at 3:59 PM, Laurent Gauch wrote: On 21/06/2011, at 1:07 AM, Laurent Gauch wrote: / // / On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Steve Bennett steveb at workware.net.au

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH 2/3] ft2232: Failure to get latency should not be fatal / OBJECTION

2011-06-21 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Laurent Gauch laurent.ga...@amontec.com wrote: Latest version, 1.0.4. Same behaviour on both MacOSX and Linux. Sure. I'll ask if they would like to fix this problem. I will let you know what useful response I get. Great. But are you sure to have the

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH 2/3] ft2232: Failure to get latency should not be fatal / OBJECTION

2011-06-21 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Xiaofan Chen xiaof...@gmail.com wrote: But are you sure to have the correct libusb version. On linux and mac, the libusb is the kernel driver for the d2xx. This has been discussed before and I think in this case an exception should be granted and the patch

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH 2/3] ft2232: Failure to get latency should not be fatal / OBJECTION

2011-06-21 Thread Steve Bennett
On 21/06/2011, at 5:01 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Xiaofan Chen xiaof...@gmail.com wrote: But are you sure to have the correct libusb version. On linux and mac, the libusb is the kernel driver for the d2xx. This has been discussed before and I think in this case

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH 2/3] ft2232: Failure to get latency should not be fatal / OBJECTION

2011-06-21 Thread Laurent Gauch
Xiaofan Chen wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Xiaofan Chen xiaof...@gmail.com wrote: But are you sure to have the correct libusb version. On linux and mac, the libusb is the kernel driver for the d2xx. This has been discussed before and I think in this case an exception should

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH 2/3] ft2232: Failure to get latency should not be fatal

2011-06-21 Thread Laurent Gauch
Steve Bennett wrote: On 21/06/2011, at 5:01 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Xiaofan Chen xiaof...@gmail.com wrote: But are you sure to have the correct libusb version. On linux and mac, the libusb is the kernel driver for the d2xx. This has been

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH 2/3] ft2232: Failure to get latency should not be fatal

2011-06-21 Thread Steve Bennett
On 21/06/2011, at 5:18 PM, Laurent Gauch wrote: Steve Bennett wrote: On 21/06/2011, at 5:01 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Xiaofan Chen xiaof...@gmail.com wrote: But are you sure to have the correct libusb version. On linux and mac, the libusb is the

[Openocd-development] [PATCH 2/3] ft2232: Failure to get latency should not be fatal

2011-06-20 Thread Steve Bennett
Instead, just produce a warning Signed-off-by: Steve Bennett ste...@workware.net.au --- src/jtag/drivers/ft2232.c |3 +-- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/jtag/drivers/ft2232.c b/src/jtag/drivers/ft2232.c index 38ead56..2e0495d 100644 ---

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH 2/3] ft2232: Failure to get latency should not be fatal

2011-06-20 Thread Øyvind Harboe
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Steve Bennett ste...@workware.net.au wrote: Instead, just produce a warning Why? It merits a comment at least? -- Øyvind Harboe Can Zylin Consulting help on your project? US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 87 40 27

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH 2/3] ft2232: Failure to get latency should not be fatal

2011-06-20 Thread Øyvind Harboe
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Steve Bennett ste...@workware.net.au wrote: On 20/06/2011, at 8:54 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote: On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Steve Bennett ste...@workware.net.au wrote: Instead, just produce a warning Why? It merits a comment at least? Seems

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH 2/3] ft2232: Failure to get latency should not be fatal / OBJECTION

2011-06-20 Thread Laurent Gauch
/ On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Steve Bennett steveb at workware.net.au https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development wrote: // On 20/06/2011, at 8:54 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote: // // On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Steve Bennett steveb at workware.net.au

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH 2/3] ft2232: Failure to get latency should not be fatal / OBJECTION

2011-06-20 Thread Steve Bennett
On 21/06/2011, at 1:07 AM, Laurent Gauch wrote: / On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Steve Bennett steveb at workware.net.au https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development wrote: // On 20/06/2011, at 8:54 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote: // // On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Steve