On 23/12/2010 8.18, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Apparently TI just did an A9 version of their BeagleBoard:
http://pandaboard.org/
Hi,
yes and I am one of the proud winners of it ;-)
You can find details of my Panda Early Adopter Project here (it
involves openocd as well):
Hi Luca,
it's great that you're working on this!
Be sure to post your results. Perhaps you would care to
create a fork of openocd on to push your work in progress?
A lot of other OpenOCD developers keep their stuff there for
all to see.
http://repo.or.cz/regproj.cgi?fork=openocd.git
Hi Luca,
it's great that you're working on this!
Be sure to post your results. Perhaps you would care to
create a fork of openocd on to push your work in progress?
A lot of other OpenOCD developers keep their stuff there for
all to see.
http://repo.or.cz/regproj.cgi?fork=openocd.git
I can't answer that question, but I would like to see a model
where each core is a GDB thread. Currently OpenOCD has
support for multiple cores by launching two GDB servers,
but it would suck to have two IDE's running just because you
have two cores.
multiple cores GDB debug sessions on the
On 23/12/2010 9.59, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Hi Luca,
it's great that you're working on this!
Be sure to post your results. Perhaps you would care to
create a fork of openocd on to push your work in progress?
A lot of other OpenOCD developers keep their stuff there for
all to see.
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
I can't answer that question, but I would like to see a model
where each core is a GDB thread. Currently OpenOCD has
support for multiple cores by launching two GDB servers,
but it would suck to have two IDE's running just because you
have two cores.
multiple cores GDB
You said OpenOCD hassupport for multiple cores by launching two GDB
servers
Do you means
IDE #1 - GDB #1 | + OpenOCD - JTAG - TAP CORE
#2 - TAP CORE #1 -
IDE #2 - GDB #2 | |---|
Does the actual OpenOCD can support
I can't find the original message with
this $SUBJECT to reply to it ... but wanted
to point out that it's nonsense.
Beagles have single OMAP3 based chips, and
thus have Cortex-A8 cores.
If you want a Cortex-A9 board, look at the
PandaBoard instead. Right now they're hard
to find; supply
Apparently TI just did an A9 version of their BeagleBoard:
http://pandaboard.org/
--
Øyvind Harboe
Can Zylin Consulting help on your project?
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 87 40 27
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash
