+++ Wookey [2009-10-10 12:33 +0100]:
> +++ Jon Smirl [2009-10-08 17:33 -0400]:
> > Can someone help me out and point me to a working cross toolchain for
> > arm7tdmi with uclibc or equivalent on Linux? I've got a working glib
> > setup but it keeps linking in 900KB of run-time code.
I had two repl
I finally got a libc working with everything build from source on 64b.
I used openembedded to make gcc. Then added in newlib. You need the
libelf from Ubuntu 9.10 in order to compile. I still have a couple of
minor issues with exceptions from div0.
Now, the downside. Contiki linked in 40KB of run
Le 10/10/2009 19:18, Jon Smirl a écrit :
> I'm able to compile the code and link it using the arm compilers from
> open-embedded. I made stubs for the problem libc functions.
>
> I'm still looking for a working, small libc. newlib won't build on 64b
> ubuntu 9.04 -- it doesn't like the libelf versi
I'm able to compile the code and link it using the arm compilers from
open-embedded. I made stubs for the problem libc functions.
I'm still looking for a working, small libc. newlib won't build on 64b
ubuntu 9.04 -- it doesn't like the libelf version in ubuntu. Next step
is trying a more current l
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 1:05 AM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> Have a look at
>
> http://opensource.zylin.com/gccbinary.html
32b binaries from this one need libmpfr.so to run. I have a 64b
version, I'd need to figure how to build the 32b one.
Are there 64b binaries available?
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gm
+++ Jon Smirl [2009-10-08 17:33 -0400]:
> Can someone help me out and point me to a working cross toolchain for
> arm7tdmi with uclibc or equivalent on Linux? I've got a working glib
> setup but it keeps linking in 900KB of run-time code.
>
> I've spent all day searching and playing with buildroot
Segfault is caused by startup.S
Uncomment this line below and the linker seg faults.
//_fiq: .word fiq
/*
* armboot - Startup Code for ARM720 CPU-core
*
* Copyright (c) 2001 Marius Gröger
* Copyright (c) 2002 Alex Züpke
*
* See file CREDITS for list of people who con
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:43 AM, David Brownell wrote:
> On Thursday 08 October 2009, Jon Smirl wrote:
>> >> Right; and does the CodeSourcery uCLinux version help at all?
>> >
>> > I'm still building it. They only had 32b pre-built binaries and I'm
>> > running 64b.
>>
>> I gave up fixing build pr
I'm currently using ELDK ARM on a Debian host (have to install alien pkg to
deal with RPMs) and CodeSourcery g++ lite. I like EMDebian and OpenEmbedded
too but the install of ELDK is as simple as:
Mount iso as loopback
run ./install -d /opt/eldk arm
export arch=ARM
export $CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux
Jon Smirl ha scritto:
> Can someone help me out and point me to a working cross toolchain for
> arm7tdmi with uclibc or equivalent on Linux? I've got a working glib
> setup but it keeps linking in 900KB of run-time code.
Are you talking about libc or glib? If you say glib, I understand the
GNOME f
you executables with a reasonable
size.
Nico Coesel
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de namens Jon Smirl
Verzonden: do 10/8/09 23:33
Aan: openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
Onderwerp: [Openocd-development] Cross compiler for ARM7 bare metal
Can
On Thursday 08 October 2009, Jon Smirl wrote:
> >> Right; and does the CodeSourcery uCLinux version help at all?
> >
> > I'm still building it. They only had 32b pre-built binaries and I'm running
> > 64b.
>
> I gave up fixing build problems on Ubuntu. Now I'm seeing if I can get
> the 32b binari
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:56 AM, David Brownell wrote:
>> On Thursday 08 October 2009, Jon Smirl wrote:
>>> libc is the problem.
>>
>> Right; and does the CodeSourcery uCLinux version help at all?
>
> I'm still building it. They only had 32b pre-
Have a look at
http://opensource.zylin.com/gccbinary.html
--
Øyvind Harboe
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash programmer
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
http
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:56 AM, David Brownell wrote:
> On Thursday 08 October 2009, Jon Smirl wrote:
>> libc is the problem.
>
> Right; and does the CodeSourcery uCLinux version help at all?
I'm still building it. They only had 32b pre-built binaries and I'm running 64b.
>
> If you're doing th
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 7:02 PM, David Brownell wrote:
> On Thursday 08 October 2009, Michel Catudal wrote:
>> An arm-linux-gcc is only for Linux based system, not bare metal stuff.
>
> Depends what you mean by "bare metal".
>
> I use "arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc" all the time to compile
> Linux ker
On Thursday 08 October 2009, Jon Smirl wrote:
> libc is the problem.
Right; and does the CodeSourcery uCLinux version help at all?
If you're doing that kind of not-quite-bare metal work, I'd
expect you would need a semicustom libc.
- Dave
___
Openoc
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Duane Ellis wrote:
> Jon Smirl wrote:
>>
>> Can someone help me out and point me to a working cross toolchain for
>> arm7tdmi with uclibc or equivalent on Linux? I've got a working glib
>> setup but it keeps linking in 900KB of run-time code.
>>
>> I've spent all da
On Thursday 08 October 2009, Michel Catudal wrote:
> > It uses an older version of GCC, to be honest with you, there are
> > *little* if any benefit you will get if you _really_ want a new version.
> >
> >
> You're kidding are you?
> There are many benefits to the newer compilers, including sup
Le 08/10/2009 19:13, Duane Ellis a écrit :
>
>
> Take a look at
>
> http://lostarm.sf.net
>
>
That is very old stuff
It is easier to download mine or create your own with my source files. I
use the latest 4.4.1 code.
> It builds a *COMPLETE* gnu gcc tool chain for ARM7TDMI - bare meta
Le 08/10/2009 19:02, David Brownell a écrit :
> On Thursday 08 October 2009, Michel Catudal wrote:
>
>> An arm-linux-gcc is only for Linux based system, not bare metal stuff.
>>
> Depends what you mean by "bare metal".
>
> I use "arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc" all the time to compile
> Linux
Jon Smirl wrote:
> Can someone help me out and point me to a working cross toolchain for
> arm7tdmi with uclibc or equivalent on Linux? I've got a working glib
> setup but it keeps linking in 900KB of run-time code.
>
> I've spent all day searching and playing with buildroot and I can't
> achieve a
On Thursday 08 October 2009, Michel Catudal wrote:
> An arm-linux-gcc is only for Linux based system, not bare metal stuff.
Depends what you mean by "bare metal".
I use "arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc" all the time to compile
Linux kernels; and sometimes for U-Boot, or stuff running
on Cortex-M3. By
Le 08/10/2009 18:13, David Brownell a écrit :
> On Thursday 08 October 2009, Jon Smirl wrote:
>
>> Can someone help me out and point me to a working cross toolchain for
>> arm7tdmi with uclibc or equivalent on Linux? I've got a working glib
>> setup but it keeps linking in 900KB of run-time cod
On Thursday 08 October 2009, Jon Smirl wrote:
> Can someone help me out and point me to a working cross toolchain for
> arm7tdmi with uclibc or equivalent on Linux? I've got a working glib
> setup but it keeps linking in 900KB of run-time code.
>
> I've spent all day searching and playing with bui
Can someone help me out and point me to a working cross toolchain for
arm7tdmi with uclibc or equivalent on Linux? I've got a working glib
setup but it keeps linking in 900KB of run-time code.
I've spent all day searching and playing with buildroot and I can't
achieve a working environment.
--
J
26 matches
Mail list logo
