On Fri, 22 May 2009, David Brownell wrote:
> On Thursday 21 May 2009, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 May 2009, David Brownell wrote:
> >
> > > I also noticed that two commands (erase, check_bad) are
> > > unusual in that they require *block* numbers as parameters,
> > > rather than the offse
On Thursday 21 May 2009, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 21 May 2009, David Brownell wrote:
>
> > I also noticed that two commands (erase, check_bad) are
> > unusual in that they require *block* numbers as parameters,
> > rather than the offsets used everywhere else in OpenOCD
> > (and in U-Boot, a
On Thu, 21 May 2009, David Brownell wrote:
> I also noticed that two commands (erase, check_bad) are
> unusual in that they require *block* numbers as parameters,
> rather than the offsets used everywhere else in OpenOCD
> (and in U-Boot, and the Linux-MTD utilities).
>
> Comments on changing tha
On Monday 18 May 2009, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > The following are some notes I put together about the "nand"
> > commands based on reading the source code.
> >
> > I plan to turn them into documentation sometime later, maybe by this
> > time next week. I've seen no documentation on the NAND comma
On Sun, 17 May 2009, David Brownell wrote:
> The following are some notes I put together about the "nand"
> commands based on reading the source code.
>
> I plan to turn them into documentation sometime later, maybe by this
> time next week. I've seen no documentation on the NAND commands; that
The following are some notes I put together about the "nand"
commands based on reading the source code.
I plan to turn them into documentation sometime later, maybe by this
time next week. I've seen no documentation on the NAND commands; that
seems like a significant omission.
Meanwhile I though
