Re: [Openocd-development] OpenOCD 0.5.0-rc2 release

2011-07-30 Thread Tomek CEDRO
Hello! :-) Trying to bootstrap on FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE fails with the 0.5.0-rc2 as given at: http://openocd.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=openocd/openocd;a=snapshot;h=d4cd6f032015552f00bf4b5a90f25f5f958e9d9e;sf=tgz This should probably never happen with the real package as configure

Re: [Openocd-development] OpenOCD 0.5.0-rc2 release

2011-07-30 Thread Andreas Fritiofson
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Tomek CEDRO tomek.ce...@gmail.com wrote: Hello! :-) Trying to bootstrap on FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE fails with the 0.5.0-rc2 as given at:

Re: [Openocd-development] OpenOCD 0.5.0-rc2 release

2011-07-14 Thread Spencer Oliver
On 14 July 2011 10:05, Luca Bruno lu...@debian.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD scrisse: But these are not really a real release, created by make dist. Surely we should be running make dist then uploading the releases to

Re: [Openocd-development] OpenOCD 0.5.0-rc2 release

2011-07-13 Thread Spencer Oliver
On 13 July 2011 02:32, Andrew Leech coronasen...@gmail.com wrote: On 11 July 2011 07:31, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com wrote: rc2 http://openocd.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=openocd/openocd;a=snapshot;h=d4cd6f032015552f00bf4b5a90f25f5f958e9d9e;sf=tgz I'm

Re: [Openocd-development] OpenOCD 0.5.0-rc2 release

2011-07-12 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 09:22 Mon 11 Jul , Spencer Oliver wrote: On 11 July 2011 07:31, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com wrote: Totally agree on this - FreeBSD ports use automatic package download and extraction mechanism, so having tarball for RC2 would be great! Please let me know

Re: [Openocd-development] OpenOCD 0.5.0-rc2 release

2011-07-12 Thread Peter Stuge
Andrew Leech wrote: Again just a release tarball issue, but the tarball from above doesn't work properly, it needs bootstrap run to get jimtcl etc In particular for a release it's really really important that the two separate packages (OpenOCD and jimtcl) are *two separate packages*. The

Re: [Openocd-development] OpenOCD 0.5.0-rc2 release

2011-07-12 Thread Andrew Leech
On 13/07/2011 11:48 AM, Peter Stuge wrote: Andrew Leech wrote: Again just a release tarball issue, but the tarball from above doesn't work properly, it needs bootstrap run to get jimtcl etc In particular for a release it's really really important that the two separate packages (OpenOCD and

Re: [Openocd-development] OpenOCD 0.5.0-rc2 release

2011-07-12 Thread Steve Bennett
On 13/07/2011, at 11:32 AM, Andrew Leech wrote: On 11 July 2011 07:31, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com wrote: rc2 http://openocd.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=openocd/openocd;a=snapshot;h=d4cd6f032015552f00bf4b5a90f25f5f958e9d9e;sf=tgz I'm assuming

Re: [Openocd-development] OpenOCD 0.5.0-rc2 release

2011-07-11 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 16:59 Sun 10 Jul , Øyvind Harboe wrote: On the subject of tarballs for release candidates. I think David Brownell and Zach Welch used to do this. At least I think you presented some evidence that perhaps at least the *first* rc should be a tarball so as to catch any problems we

Re: [Openocd-development] OpenOCD 0.5.0-rc2 release

2011-07-11 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 15:20 Sun 10 Jul , Tomek CEDRO wrote: On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Luca Bruno lu...@debian.org wrote: As a sidenote, publishing tarball for -rc helps testing in conditions similar to the final one, avoiding late bugs introduced by autotools packaging or similar. Totally agree

Re: [Openocd-development] OpenOCD 0.5.0-rc2 release

2011-07-11 Thread Freddie Chopin
Tarballs available for 0.4.0-rcs allowed me to build executables which would show correct version on startup as well as PDF User's Guide with correct tag. Now all people can see is 0.5.0-dev. Real release tarballs would be really appreciated... 4\/3!!

Re: [Openocd-development] OpenOCD 0.5.0-rc2 release

2011-07-10 Thread Luca Bruno
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD scrisse: Here is OpenOCD v0.5.0-rc2 This time on the official git tree The following changes since commit ff640f197a9a343b2f3ed10e9174e35282334e8c: It looks like you forgot to push the corresponding tag. I took the liberty to take this commit

Re: [Openocd-development] OpenOCD 0.5.0-rc2 release

2011-07-10 Thread Øyvind Harboe
On the subject of tarballs for release candidates. I think David Brownell and Zach Welch used to do this. At least I think you presented some evidence that perhaps at least the *first* rc should be a tarball so as to catch any problems -- Øyvind Harboe - Can Zylin Consulting help on your

Re: [Openocd-development] OpenOCD 0.5.0-rc2 release

2011-07-10 Thread Tomek CEDRO
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Luca Bruno lu...@debian.org wrote: As a sidenote, publishing tarball for -rc helps testing in conditions similar to the final one, avoiding late bugs introduced by autotools packaging or similar. Totally agree on this - FreeBSD ports use automatic package

[Openocd-development] OpenOCD 0.5.0-rc2 release

2011-07-04 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Hi, Today is RC day Here is OpenOCD v0.5.0-rc2 This time on the official git tree The following changes since commit ff640f197a9a343b2f3ed10e9174e35282334e8c: cortex_m3: add auto maskisr (2011-06-28 14:16:48 +0100) are available in the git repository at: