It's an accident normally we are supposed to 0.5.0-rc2xxx
I'm currently genereating the release
sorry for the delay I was busy on the kernel merge window
np! The OpenOCD's maintainers official policy is not to overlap with
the kernel merge window! :-)
--
Øyvind Harboe - Can Zylin
On 08:56 Fri 05 Aug , Øyvind Harboe wrote:
When I run git describe now I get v0.4.0-973-g0d7a948 rather than
a v0.5.0-rc2-.
Is that intentional?
I think it's nice that we stick to v0.4.0- until v0.5.0- goes out
of the door.
I have no particular opinion, except it should
When I run git describe now I get v0.4.0-973-g0d7a948 rather than
a v0.5.0-rc2-.
Is that intentional?
I think it's nice that we stick to v0.4.0- until v0.5.0- goes out
of the door.
I have no particular opinion, except it should be by choice and not
by accident :-)
--
Øyvind
On 5 August 2011 07:56, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com wrote:
When I run git describe now I get v0.4.0-973-g0d7a948 rather than
a v0.5.0-rc2-.
Is that intentional?
I think it's nice that we stick to v0.4.0- until v0.5.0- goes out
of the door.
I have no particular
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.comwrote:
When I run git describe now I get v0.4.0-973-g0d7a948 rather than
a v0.5.0-rc2-.
Is that intentional?
I think it's nice that we stick to v0.4.0- until v0.5.0- goes out
of the door.
I have no
On 5 August 2011 09:58, Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com
wrote:
When I run git describe now I get v0.4.0-973-g0d7a948 rather than
a v0.5.0-rc2-.
Is that intentional?
I think it's nice that we
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.ukwrote:
On 5 August 2011 09:58, Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com
wrote:
When I run git describe now I get
On 5 August 2011 10:19, Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk
wrote:
On 5 August 2011 09:58, Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Øyvind Harboe
On 5 August 2011 10:26, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk wrote:
On 5 August 2011 10:19, Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk
wrote:
On 5 August 2011 09:58, Andreas Fritiofson
Release tags are annotated, but not rc tags
This sounds like a good policy to me.
--
Øyvind Harboe - Can Zylin Consulting help on your project?
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 87 40 27
http://www.zylin.com/
___
Openocd-development
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.ukwrote:
Release tags are annotated, but not rc tags
Oh, but they are, or am I completely oblivious of git tags (quite possible)?
$ git checkout v0.4.0-rc2~2
$ git describe
v0.4.0-rc1-193-g747a607
On 5 August 2011 10:39, Andreas Fritiofson andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk
wrote:
Release tags are annotated, but not rc tags
Oh, but they are, or am I completely oblivious of git tags (quite possible)?
$ git
And why shouldn't they be?
To me it's a matter of taste if rc candidate tags are annotated or not.
I'm good with either choice. I was just curious as to whether it was accidental
or intentional.
Looks like it was accidental in that we really should be using the release
procedure and when we
On 5 August 2011 11:07, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com wrote:
And why shouldn't they be?
To me it's a matter of taste if rc candidate tags are annotated or not.
I'm good with either choice. I was just curious as to whether it was
accidental
or intentional.
Looks like it was
14 matches
Mail list logo
