Hi Spencer,
Idea is to bring the stm32 flash drivers inline with their
actual names, eg.
stm32x to stm32f1x
stm32f2xxx to stm32f2x
This is a good idea to clean that up.
I think you can go one step further by dropping the 'x' (which has no meaning)
in order to rename:
- stm32x to stm32f1
-
On 28 July 2011 13:41, Laurent Charpentier laurent_p...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Spencer,
Idea is to bring the stm32 flash drivers inline with their
actual names, eg.
stm32x to stm32f1x
stm32f2xxx to stm32f2x
This is a good idea to clean that up.
I think you can go one step further by dropping
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk wrote:
I sort of like the x - but the majority rules.
Any more votes?
I also like the xxx :-P :-) :-)
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
Openocd-development
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk wrote:
I sort of like the x - but the majority rules.
Any more votes?
I like the x as well.
--
Xiaofan
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Spencer Oliver s...@spen-soft.co.uk wrote:
This is a good idea to clean that up.
I think you can go one step further by dropping the 'x' (which has no
meaning) in order to rename:
- stm32x to stm32f1
- stm32f2xxx to stm32f2
Seriously speaking - no offense
Hi,
Idea is to bring the stm32 flash drivers inline with their actual names, eg.
stm32x to stm32f1x
stm32f2xxx to stm32f2x
This is also getting ready for the new stm32f4x family
Any comments?
Cheers
Spen
___
Openocd-development mailing list
