David,
Thanks for the info. I'm slowly making progress.
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 4:58 AM, David Brownell davi...@pacbell.net wrote:
..
I'm not sure why that diagnostic
Error: imx25.cpu: IR capture error; saw 0x3E1011 not 0x..1
is there; it looks bizarre, that *is* an LSB of b0001,
David,
You were right about the ir lengths, but I also had to put back in the code
that ignores non b01 for taps with 0 ids. The i.mx31 has the same weird tap
with no id and no b01 in the capture. The i.mx25 config and patch are
attached.
John
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 6:03 PM, David Brownell
Does this mail reach the list?
(Do not respond, I'll see it in the archives :-)
--
Øyvind Harboe
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash programmer
___
Openocd-development mailing list
On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
--- src/target/arm7_9_common.c(revision 2714)
+++ src/target/arm7_9_common.c(working copy)
@@ -1021,6 +1021,17 @@
return ERROR_FAIL;
}
+ /* at this point trst has been asserted/deasserted once. We
There was a suggestion for using Google groups to host the mailing list.
I've had success with it in the past with projects like Symfony. As long as
the mailing list isn't hosted on Yahoo groups, I won't complain (LEON3
people do this and I don't like it).
OK. Google groups is one
http://repo.or.cz/m/regproj.cgi
Looks like it; yes. Will you set that up?
Yes. We can also have a link from the sourceforge pages of
the official mirror...
Let me know as soon as you've done that; I'm prepping a
patch to switch all the source tree references from SVN
to GIT, and I
On Monday 05 October 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
In short, the following will happen:
1. The source will be held in git.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/openocd/
!!! And if anyone objects to GIT, please speak up ASAP !!!
So far the only issue raised with $SUBJECT seems to be
that we
So the only thing we need to agree on *now* is to
move git to sourceforge.
No dissent heard so far on that one.
I also believe there is a consensus that Berlios does
not have the qualities we're looking for and that
we need to either move away now or get a plan
in place asap for migrating away.
Migrate away from Berlios committe wants an alternative
to Berlios mailing lists.
Some alternatives so far:
- Set up seperate openocd.org server = not going to happen. We
don't have the resources and dedication to run it.
- sourceforge mailing lists apparently suck more than Berlios
mailing
I was going to set up a mirror of the sourceforge git at
http://repo.or.cz/, except that it does not support mirroring
anything but http:// url's and sourceforge uses git:// for
public url's. G.
Other than that http://repo.or.cz/ looks *great*. No fluff,
just a mirror that's updated every
Since many people seem to not be fond of sourceforge, have
you considered GitHub? Just put a README.markdown in the
project and it will become a nice webpage front for the
project. They already provide source browsing and snapshots
available via HTTP, and make it trivially easy for anyone
to (a)
Hello Øyvind,
Monday, October 5, 2009, 11:28:45 PM, you wrote:
ØH Migrate away from Berlios committe wants an alternative
ØH to Berlios mailing lists.
ØH Some alternatives so far:
ØH - Set up seperate openocd.org server = not going to happen. We
ØH don't have the resources and dedication to
Le 05/10/2009 17:19, Øyvind Harboe a écrit :
So the only thing we need to agree on *now* is to
move git to sourceforge.
I am supportive of the move to sourceforge.
No dissent heard so far on that one.
I also believe there is a consensus that Berlios does
not have the qualities we're
On Monday 05 October 2009, Austin, Alex wrote:
Since many people seem to not be fond of sourceforge,
AFAIK that's just the email. Which has issues like
crappy archives, bad spam filtering, ads, and such.
have you considered GitHub?
In terms of GIT support is it significantly better
than
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Dirk Behme dirk.be...@googlemail.com wrote:
3. the mailing list will be disabled and all openocd subscribers will
receive an invitation to subscribe to the openocd mailing list at
sourceforge. The sourceforge mailing list is the least sucky
alternative for
And in case anyone wants suggestions about how to start
learning ...
http://git-scm.com/course/svn.html
That's addressed to folk more familiar with SVN than GIT.
- Dave
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 7:37 AM, David Brownell davi...@pacbell.net wrote:
On Monday 05 October 2009, Austin, Alex wrote:
Since many people seem to not be fond of sourceforge,
AFAIK that's just the email. Which has issues like
crappy archives, bad spam filtering, ads, and such.
have you
-Original Message-
From: David Brownell [mailto:davi...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 6:37 PM
To: openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
Cc: Austin, Alex
Subject: Re: [Openocd-development] Moving to git
On Monday 05 October 2009, Austin, Alex wrote:
Since many
W.r.t. the choice of sourceforge for git:
- we already have it running and tested there
- there is no obviously superior alternative. If we switch
every time we find something that is 10% better, we'll
never get stability and a decision in place.
Does anyone know a git hosting alternative that
19 matches
Mail list logo
