On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 07:48 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 3:04 AM, Zachary T Welch z...@superlucidity.net
wrote:
Commands that do not need to use Jim should be registered as
high-level command handlers.
Why is that?
Nb! ls *does* need to use jim to return a list
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net wrote:
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 07:48 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 3:04 AM, Zachary T Welch z...@superlucidity.net
wrote:
Commands that do not need to use Jim should be registered as
high-level command
Commands that do not need to use Jim should be registered as
high-level command handlers.
Signed-off-by: Zachary T Welch z...@superlucidity.net
---
src/helper/ioutil.c | 29 +++--
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/helper/ioutil.c
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 3:04 AM, Zachary T Welch z...@superlucidity.net wrote:
Commands that do not need to use Jim should be registered as
high-level command handlers.
Why is that?
Nb! ls *does* need to use jim to return a list of directory
names used by other jim commands.
--
Øyvind Harboe
