> I investigated a bit, and openocd needs to provide an XML target description
> (qXfer:features:read) to GDB that supports it (qSupported:xmlRegisters).
I'd prefer a patch that just fixes it once and for all, but in lieu of that and
as a start perhaps a patch w/the .xml file and openocd.texi upda
On 08/25/2011 02:17 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:16 PM, j. m. norris wrote:
Would it make sense for someone to collect a 'wish list' of
'architectures
and registers'
and then prioritize it?
Ultimately we need patches :-) It doesn't matter if we want something but
nobody
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:16 PM, j. m. norris wrote:
>>> Would it make sense for someone to collect a 'wish list' of
>>> 'architectures
>>> and registers'
>>> and then prioritize it?
>>
>> Ultimately we need patches :-) It doesn't matter if we want something but
>> nobody
>> can work on it, but pe
> Would it make sense for someone to collect a 'wish list' of 'architectures
> and registers'
> and then prioritize it?
Ultimately we need patches :-) It doesn't matter if we want something but nobody
can work on it, but perhaps it could be good as a starting point for a
discussion?
--
Øyvind
We need more support in OpenOCD to handle variations on the ARM
architecture and registers. Spencer wrote about this a while ago.
Patches anyone?
Would it make sense for someone to collect a 'wish list' of
'architectures and registers'
and then prioritize it?
__
We need more support in OpenOCD to handle variations on the ARM
architecture and registers. Spencer wrote about this a while ago.
Patches anyone?
--
Øyvind Harboe - Can Zylin Consulting help on your project?
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 87 40 27
http://www.zylin.com/
___
