Freddie Chopin wrote:
But I disagree with reverting the commit. Fix the problem instead.
What?
So you don't know how to fix that, I don't know how to fix that, but
we cannot revert a one-line change that introduced A BUG just
because it (supposedly - I did not check) adds some functionality
On 2011-10-21 20:13, Peter Stuge wrote:
Meanwhile, the workaround is quite trivial.
Yeah, right... Tell that to thousands of OpenOCD users who do NOT build
their binary. How can they change startup.tcl when it's hardcoded into
openocd.exe?
I'm more interested in knowing if not using
Hi Freddie,
as a policy we wait for all information that we expect to arrive
on a bug so that we can hopefully fix the problem once and
for all. This is slower, but ultimately means higher quality because
we make more informed changes to OpenOCD.
It isn't going to make a difference if we wait
